Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775999›Full record

Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2019

The Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture Using Internal Fixation with Fixed-angle Plates.

Patrick Ziegler, Sven Maier, Ulrich Stöckle, Markus Gühring, Fabian M Stuby

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carbon-fibre plates for traumatic and (impending) pathological fracture fixation: Where do we stand? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient perspective on the use of carbon fibre plates for extremity fracture fixation.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Minimum 2-year results of the second-generation CFR-PEEK locking plate on the proximal humeral fracture.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fracture fixation in extremity trauma with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates: evidence today.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick ZieglerBG Hospital Tübingen, University Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tübingen, Germany; Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Germany; Center for Bone and Joint Surgery, Kronprinzenbau Hospital, Reutlingen, Germany; BG Hospital Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Sven Maier
Ulrich Stöckle
Markus Gühring
Fabian M Stuby
Kreiskliniken Reutlingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplants made of various types of material can be used for the internal fixation of fractures. Carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) is a radiolucent material that may have advantageous handling properties compared with titanium implants.

methodsSeventy-six patients with proximal humerus fractures requiring surgery were randomized to receive a fixed-angle plate made out of either titanium or CFR- PEEK. To measure the functional outcome, the DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; primary endpoint), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were determined in 63 patients at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months after surgery, accompanied at each time point by radiological evaluation.

resultsBoth groups displayed improvement in DASH scores 6 months after surgery (CFR-PEEK: 27.5 ± 20.5; titanium: 28.5 ± 17.9; p = 0.82). Sensitivity analysis with multiple imputations confirmed this result (27.4 ± 19.2 versus 28.5 ± 16.6). The OSS and SST scores were likewise improved in both groups. All patients displayed full bony consolidation 12 weeks after surgery. In no case was material failure, secondary dislocation, or screw perforation seen. No difference was seen in the maintenance of postoperative reposition between the CFR-PEEK group and the titanium group.

conclusionThe internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with either CFR-PEEK or titanium led to clinical improvement 6 months after surgery. No clinical or radiological difference in outcomes was seen between the two groups. Because of the study design, however, the equivalence of the two interventions was not con- clusively demonstrated; a non-inferiority study would have been needed for this purpose.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesAgedFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedShoulder FracturesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31775999
PMCPMC6916705
OpenAlexW2984193720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.