Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775858›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2019

A comparison of clinical paediatric guidelines for hypotension with population-based lower centiles: a systematic review.

Nienke N Hagedoorn, Joany M Zachariasse, Henriette A Moll

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Anthracycline-induced hypertension in pediatric cancer survivors: unveiling the long-term cardiovascular risks.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nienke N HagedoornDepartment of Paediatrics, Room Sp 1540, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joany M ZachariasseDepartment of Paediatrics, Room Sp 1540, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriette A MollDepartment of Paediatrics, Room Sp 1540, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.a.moll@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent definitions exist for hypotension in children. In this study, we aim to identify evidence-based reference values for low blood pressure and to compare these with existing definitions for systolic hypotension.

methodsWe searched online databases until February 2019 (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies that defined age-related centiles (first to fifth centile) for non-invasive systolic blood pressure in healthy children < 18 years. Existing cut-offs for hypotension were identified in international guidelines and textbooks. The age-related centiles and clinical cut-offs were compared and visualized using step charts.

resultsFourteen studies with population-based centiles were selected, of which 2 addressed children < 1 year. Values for the fifth centile differed 8 to 17 mmHg for age. We identified 13 clinical cut-offs of which only 5 reported accurate references. Age-related cut-offs for hypotension showed large variability (ranging from 15 to 30 mmHg). The clinical cut-offs varied in agreement with the low centiles. The definition from Paediatric Advanced Life Support agreed well for children < 12 years but was below the fifth centiles for children > 12 years. For children > 12 years, the definition of Parshuram's early warning score agreed well, but the Advanced Paediatric Life Support definition was above the fifth centiles.

conclusionsThe different clinical guidelines for low blood pressure show large variability and low to moderate agreement with population-based lower centiles. For children < 12 years, the Paediatric Advanced Life Support definition fits best but it underestimates hypotension in older children. For children > 12 years, the Advanced Paediatric Life Support overestimates hypotension but Parshuram's cut-off for hypotension in the early warning score agrees well. Future studies should focus on developing reference values for hypotension for acutely ill children.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansHypotensionMalePediatricsPopulation SurveillanceReference ValuesHypotensionPercentilesReference valuesVital signs

Identifiers

PMID31775858
PMCPMC6882047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.