ArticleGlobalization and health2019
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.
Article in Globalization and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impacts of intellectual property provisions in trade treaties on access to medicine in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.Globalization and health · 2019Pooled it
- Freedom to Trade and Safeguarding the National Health Service (NHS) - Did the UK-Australia Free Trade Agreement Safeguard the NHS?International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026Article
- Patent challenges without entry? Reassessing first generic exclusivity under the patent-linkage system in South Korea.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- 'Knowing how the machine works': a novel framework for engaging with the political determinants of health.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- The Political Economy of the World Health Organization Model Lists of Essential Medicines.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Article
- The potential impact of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Prans-Pacific Partnership on Thailand's hepatitis C treatment program.Globalization and health · 2024Article
- Why meta-regulation matters for public health: the case of the EU better regulation agenda.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy.Globalization and health · 2023Review
- COVID-19, Trade, and Health: This Changes Everything? Comment on "What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership".International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- International Trade and Health in Thailand: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Intellectual property and access to medicines: mapping public attitudes toward pharmaceuticals during the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) negotiation process.Globalization and health · 2021Article
- Understanding the trends in international agreements on pricing and reimbursement for newly marketed medicines and their implications for access to medicines: a computational text analysis.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Projected spending for brand-name drugs in English primary care given US prices: a cross-sectional study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020Article
- Why the COVID-19 pandemic should be a call for action to advance equitable access to medicines.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- USMCA 2.0: a few improvements but far from a 'healthy' trade treaty.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Radical Approaches During Unusual Circumstances: Intellectual Property Regulation and the COVID-19 Dilemma.Development (Society for International Development) · 2020Article
- Improving access to medicines to reduce marketing and use of substandard and falsified medicines in Africa: Scoping review.The journal of medicine accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrade and investment agreements negotiated after the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) have included increasingly elevated protection of intellectual property rights along with an expanding array of rules impacting many aspects of pharmaceutical policy. Despite the large body of literature on intellectual property and access to affordable medicines, the ways in which other provisions in trade agreements can affect pharmaceutical policy and, in turn, access to medicines have been little studied. There is a need for an analytical framework covering the full range of provisions, pathways, and potential impacts, on which to base future health and human rights impact assessment and research. A framework exploring the ways in which trade and investment agreements may affect pharmaceutical policy was developed, based on an analysis of four recently negotiated regional trade agreements. First a set of core pharmaceutical policy objectives based on international consensus was identified. A systematic comparative analysis of the publicly available legal texts of the four agreements was undertaken, and the potential impacts of the provisions in these agreements on the core pharmaceutical policy objectives were traced through an analysis of possible pathways.
resultsAn analytical framework is presented, linking ten types of provisions in the four trade agreements to potential impacts on four core pharmaceutical policy objectives (access and affordability; safety, efficacy, and quality; rational use of medicines; and local production capacity and health security) via various pathways.
conclusionsThe analytical framework highlights provisions in trade and investment agreements that need to be examined, pathways that should be explored, and potential impacts that should be taken into consideration with respect to pharmaceutical policy. This may serve as a useful checklist or template for health and human rights impact assessments and research on the implications of trade agreements for pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.