Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775755›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Rubber plantations and drug resistant malaria: a cross-sectional survey in Cambodia.

Rebecca Thomson, Phok Sochea, Mak Sarath, Amanda MacDonald, Abigail Pratt, Steve Poyer, Henrietta Allen, Sok Kunthy, Sok Chamroeun, Kim Daro and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca ThomsonDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Phok SocheaPopulation Services Khmer, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mak SarathPopulation Services Khmer, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Amanda MacDonaldPopulation Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Abigail PrattPopulation Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Steve PoyerPopulation Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Henrietta AllenPopulation Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Sok KunthyPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sok ChamroeunPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kim DaroPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sourn SameanPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Nou PanharithPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sok RaPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chan SovotthaPartners for Development-LSHTM Partnership, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Gary MundyHelen Keller International, New York, USA.
Shunmay YeungDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. shunmay.yeung@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-0850
Population Services International · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBHelen Keller International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing spread of artemisinin resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a major threat to global health. In response, countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region, including Cambodia, have declared ambitious goals to eliminate malaria. Major challenges include the lack of information on the at-risk population-individuals who live or work in or near the forest where the malaria vectors are found, including plantation workers. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap through a cross-sectional survey conducted in rubber plantations in Cambodia in 2014.

methodsThe survey was conducted in two rounds in four provinces and included a malaria prevalence survey, analysis for the K13 genetic mutation, and a comprehensive behavioural questionnaire. Forty plantations were included in each round, and 4201 interviews were conducted. An additional 701 blood samples were collected from family members of plantation workers.

resultsOverall malaria prevalence was relatively low with adjusted PCR prevalence rate of 0.6% for P. falciparum and 0.3% for Plasmodium vivax, and was very heterogenous between plantations. There was little difference in risk between permanent residents and temporary workers, and between the two rounds. The main risk factors for P. falciparum infection were smaller plantations, age under 30 years, lack of self-reported use of a treated net and recent travel, especially to the Northeastern provinces. Proximity of plantations to the forest was also a risk factor for malaria in round one, while male gender was also a risk factor for malaria by either species.

conclusionsWith Cambodia's P. falciparum elimination target on the horizon, identifying every single malaria case will become increasingly important. Plantations workers are relatively accessible compared to some other at-risk groups and will likely remain a high priority. Ongoing surveillance and adaptive strategies will be critical if malaria elimination is to be achieved in this setting.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceForestryAdolescentAdultAntimalarialsArtemisininsCambodiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeveaHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisininsArtemisinin resistanceAsiaCambodiaForestMalariaPlantations

Identifiers

PMID31775755
PMCPMC6882203
OpenAlexW2990016143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.