Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775745›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 system against ruminant animal brucellosis.

Garyfalia Karponi, Spyridon K Kritas, Gina Papadopoulou, Elissavet-Kalliopi Akrioti, Eleni Papanikolaou, Evanthia Petridou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Protective Effects againstJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Garyfalia KarponiDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. gkarponi@vet.auth.gr.
Spyridon K KritasDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Gina PapadopoulouCellular Immunology Laboratory, Basic Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Elissavet-Kalliopi AkriotiLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology-Stem Cells, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, 11521, Athens, Greece.
Eleni PapanikolaouLaboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Evanthia PetridouDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRBiomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPasteur Hellenic Institute · GR

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation 5001552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis, caused by several Brucella species, such as the bacterium Brucella melitensis, is considered one of the most severe zoonotic diseases worldwide. Not only does it affect ruminant animal populations, leading to a substantial financial burden for stockbreeders, but also poses severe public health issues. For almost four decades in southern Europe and elsewhere, eradication of the disease has been based on ambiguously effective programs, rendering massive sanitation of livestock urgent and indispensable. Gene therapy, which has been proved effective in the clinic, could possibly constitute an alternative option towards a permanent cure for brucellosis, by aiding in the deletion or inactivation of genes associated with the replication of Brucella within the host cells.

resultsWe infected ovine macrophages with B.melitensis, to simulate the host cell/microorganism interaction in vitro, and transduced the infected cells with CRISPR/Cas9 lentiviral vectors that target Brucella's RNA polymerase subunit A (RpolA) or virulence-associated gene virB10 at a multiplicity of infection of 60. We demonstrate a significant decrease in the bacterial load per cell when infected cells are transduced with the RpolA vector and that the number of internalized brucellae per cell remains unaffected when macrophages are transduced with a conventional lentiviral vector expressing the green fluorescence protein, thus underlining the bactericidal effect of our CRISPR/Cas9 system.

conclusionsPending in vivo verification of our findings, overall, these results may prove critical not only for the treatment of human brucellosis, but for other infectious diseases in general.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBrucella melitensisBrucellosisCells, CulturedDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGene EditingGenetic TherapyMacrophagesSheepSheep DiseasesBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesBrucellosisGene therapyMacrophagesRuminant animalsViral vectors

Identifiers

PMID31775745
PMCPMC6880386
OpenAlexW2991587694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.