ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Latent Dirichlet Allocation in predicting clinical trial terminations.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Pooled it
- Development of a machine learning model using structured and unstructured features for predicting surgery among patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: development and validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Success rates of American clinical oncology trials by geographic factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Approaches in analyzing predictors of trial failure: a scoping review and meta-epidemiological study.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on Open-Door Policies in Psychiatry: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A clinical trial termination prediction model based on denoising autoencoder and deep survival regression.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Construction of an Early Alert System for Intradialytic Hypotension before Initiating Hemodialysis Based on Machine Learning.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based risk prediction for interventional clinical trials based on protocol design: A retrospective study.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Integrating unsupervised and supervised learning techniques to predict traumatic brain injury: A population-based study.Intelligence-based medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Examining Analytic Practices in Latent Dirichlet Allocation Within Psychological Science: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Characterising Negative Mental Imagery in Adolescent Social Anxiety.Cognitive therapy and research · 2022Article
- Predictive modeling of clinical trial terminations using feature engineering and embedding learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Harnessing Latent Dirichlet Allocation-based topic modeling to unveil the focus areas in Ayush healthcare in India.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study used natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques to identify reliable patterns from within research narrative documents to distinguish studies that complete successfully, from the ones that terminate. Recent research findings have reported that at least 10 % of all studies that are funded by major research funding agencies terminate without yielding useful results. Since it is well-known that scientific studies that receive funding from major funding agencies are carefully planned, and rigorously vetted through the peer-review process, it was somewhat daunting to us that study-terminations are this prevalent. Moreover, our review of the literature about study terminations suggested that the reasons for study terminations are not well understood. We therefore aimed to address that knowledge gap, by seeking to identify the factors that contribute to study failures.
methodWe used data from the clinicialTrials.gov repository, from which we extracted both structured data (study characteristics), and unstructured data (the narrative description of the studies). We applied natural language processing techniques to the unstructured data to quantify the risk of termination by identifying distinctive topics that are more frequently associated with trials that are terminated and trials that are completed. We used the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) technique to derive 25 "topics" with corresponding sets of probabilities, which we then used to predict study-termination by utilizing random forest modeling. We fit two distinct models - one using only structured data as predictors and another model with both structured data and the 25 text topics derived from the unstructured data.
resultsIn this paper, we demonstrate the interpretive and predictive value of LDA as it relates to predicting clinical trial failure. The results also demonstrate that the combined modeling approach yields robust predictive probabilities in terms of both sensitivity and specificity, relative to a model that utilizes the structured data alone.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that the use of topic modeling using LDA significantly raises the utility of unstructured data in better predicating the completion vs. termination of studies. This study sets the direction for future research to evaluate the viability of the designs of health studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.