Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775735›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Menstrual health and hygiene among Indigenous Australian girls and women: barriers and opportunities.

Emily Krusz, Nina Hall, Dani J Barrington, Sandra Creamer, Wendy Anders, Minnie King, Helen Martin, Julie Hennegan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How Do Fluctuations in Endogenous Sex Hormones Affect Breast Pain in Female Athletes?Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025
    Article
  3. A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan of Health Literacy and Resources Related to Menstrual Health for Aboriginal Women in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily KruszThe University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Nina HallThe University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. n.hall2@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-6332
Dani J BarringtonThe University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Sandra CreamerNational Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Alliance, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Wendy AndersNational Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Alliance, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Minnie KingWomen on Country, Weipa, QLD, 4874, Australia.
Helen MartinWomen on Country, Weipa, NT, 4874, Australia.
Julie HenneganDepartment of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Water Institute, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies · AUThe University of Queensland · AUJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health inequities inhibit global development and achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. One gendered health area, Menstrual Health & Hygiene (MHH), has received increasing attention in Low- and Middle-Income Countries as a barrier to health, wellbeing, and gender equity. Recent anecdotal evidence in Australia highlights that MHH also present challenges to High Income Countries, particularly among underrepresented populations, such as Indigenous Australian peoples, people from low socio-economic backgrounds, or communities that are remotely located. In this article, we chart the emergence of attention to MHH in the Australian context and highlight key considerations for the conduct of research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples within the culturally- and gender-sensitive area of MHH. Further we draw on insights offered by a partnership between female Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, NGO stakeholders, and non-Indigenous researchers. Through a convening (yarning circle) held in March 2018, the group identified multiple socioecological considerations for MHH research and practice, including: affordability and access to menstrual products, barriers to knowledge and culturally sensitive education, infrastructure and supply chain challenges, and the necessity of Indigenous-led research and community-driven data collection methods in addressing the sensitive topic. We draw together these insights to develop recommendations for future research, advocacy, and action in Australia.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationCultural CompetencyMenstrual Hygiene ProductsMenstruationWomen's HealthAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousHumansQuality ImprovementSocioeconomic FactorsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesAustraliaCommentaryIndigenous AustraliansMenstrual healthMenstrual hygieneParticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID31775735
PMCPMC6882156
OpenAlexW2991115256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.