Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775689›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Developing a critical realist informed framework to explain how the human rights and social determinants of health relationship works.

Fiona Haigh, Lynn Kemp, Patricia Bazeley, Neil Haigh

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Telerehabilitation of patients with stroke: Initial program theories for successful implementation.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Child Immunization during COVID-19: A Mixed Methods Case Study of Pathanamthitta District, Kerala.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona HaighCentre for Health Equity Training, Research & Evaluation (CHETRE), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. f.haigh@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-5118
Lynn KempTranslational Research and Social Innovation Unit (TReSI), Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Patricia BazeleyTranslational Research and Social Innovation Unit (TReSI), Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Neil HaighEdQuest, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Funding

p53 Acetylation as a Mechanism in Chemoprevention by AspirinR03CA133061 · NCI · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI GUNAJE, JAYARAMA B · 2009 to 2010
$149k
National Health and Medical Research Council RG133061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThat there is a relationship between human rights and health is well established and frequently discussed. However, actions intended to take account of the relationship between human rights and social determinants of health have often been limited by lack of clarity and ambiguity concerning how these rights and determinants may interact and affect each other. It is difficult to know what to do when you do not understand how things work. As our own understanding of this consideration is founded on perspectives provided by the critical realist paradigm, we present an account of and commentary on our application of these perspectives in an investigation of this relationship.

findingsWe define the concept of paradigm and review critical realism and related implications for construction of knowledge concerning this relationship. Those implications include the need to theorise possible entities involved in the relationship together with their distinctive properties and consequential power to affect one another through exercise of their respective mechanisms (ways of working). This theorising work enabled us identify a complex, multi-layered assembly of entities involved in the relationship and some of the array of causal mechanisms that may be in play. These are presented in a summary framework.

conclusionResearchers' views about the nature of knowledge and its construction inevitably influence their research aims, approaches and outcomes. We demonstrate that by attending to these views, which are founded in their paradigm positioning, researchers can make more progress in understanding the relationship between human rights and the social determinants of health, in particular when engaged in theorizing work. The same approaches could be drawn on when other significant relationships in health environments are investigated.

Indexed as

Human RightsResearch DesignSocial Determinants of HealthHumansCritical realismExplanatory modelHealth equityHuman rightsParadigmSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31775689
PMCPMC6882063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.