Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775677›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).

Joyce van den Berg, Charlotte C Hamel, Marcus P Snijders, Sjors F Coppus, Frank P Vandenbussche

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03212352 (Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03212352 phase4terminatednot on this map

Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Failure: a Randomized Double Blind Placebo-controlled Comparison (Triple M Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2018 to 2020Enrolled342ConditionsEarly Pregnancy FailureArmsMifepristone, Misoprostol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical methods for first trimester abortion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. "Clandestine" home delivery with mifepristone.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joyce van den BergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS, 6500, The Netherlands.
Charlotte C HamelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS, 6500, The Netherlands. l.hamel@cwz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-6669
Marcus P SnijdersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Postbus 9015, Nijmegen, GS, 6500, The Netherlands.
Sjors F CoppusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, De Run 4600, Veldhoven, DB, 5504, The Netherlands.
Frank P VandenbusscheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, GA, 6525, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars 3080 B15-191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly pregnancy failure (EPF) is a common complication of pregnancy. If women do not abort spontaneously, they will undergo medical or surgical treatment in order to remove the products of conception from the uterus. Curettage, although highly effective, is associated with a risk of complications; medical treatment with misoprostol is a safe and less expensive alternative. Unfortunately, after 1 week of expectant management in case of EPF, medical treatment with misoprostol has a complete evacuation rate of approximately 50%. Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination. This study will test the hypothesis that, in EPF, the sequential combination of mifepristone with misoprostol is superior to the use of misoprostol alone in terms of complete evacuation (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs (secondary outcomes).

methodsThe trial will be performed multi-centred, prospectively, two-armed, randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Women with confirmed EPF by ultrasonography (6-14 weeks), managed expectantly for at least 1 week, can be included and randomised to pre-treatment with oral mifepristone (600 mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance). Randomisation will take place after receiving written consent to participate. In both arms pre-treatment will be followed by oral misoprostol, which will start 36-48 h later consisting of two doses 400 μg (4 hrs apart), repeated after 24 h if no tissue is lost. Four hundred sixty-four women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. Ultrasonography 2 weeks after treatment will determine short term treatment effect. When the gestational sac is expulsed, expectant management is advised until 6 weeks after treatment when the definitive primary endpoint, complete or incomplete evacuation, will be determined. A sonographic endometrial thickness < 15 mm using only the allocated therapy by randomisation is considered as successful treatment. Secondary outcome measures (patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs) will be registered using a case report form, patient diary and validated questionnaires (Short Form 36, EuroQol-VAS, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire). DISCUSSION: This trial will answer the question if, in case of EPF, after at least 1 week of expectant management, sequential treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone to achieve complete evacuation of the products of conception.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov (d.d. 02-07-2017): NCT03212352. Trialregister.nl (d.d. 03-07-2017): NTR6550. EudraCT number (d.d. 07-08-2017): 2017-002694-19. File number Commisie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (d.d. 07-08-2017): NL 62449.091.17.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortifacient Agents, SteroidalAbortion, IncompleteAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMifepristoneMisoprostolMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortifacient Agents, SteroidalMifepristoneMisoprostolEarly pregnancy failureMifepristoneMiscarriageMisoprostolMissed abortion

Identifiers

PMID31775677
PMCPMC6880504
OpenAlexW2989835830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.