ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Hierarchical clustering of maximum parsimony reconciliations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- MetageneCluster: a Python package for filtering conflicting signal trends in metagene plots.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Deciphering the Origin of DNA Viruses (Replication-Associated Parvo-NS1) That Infect Vertebrates from Invertebrate-Infecting Viruses.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- On parsimony and clustering.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Phylogenetic reconciliation.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Virulence-Associated Genes ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tree Reconciliation Methods for Host-Symbiont Cophylogenetic Analyses.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Efficiently sparse listing of classes of optimal cophylogeny reconciliations.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaximum parsimony reconciliation in the duplication-transfer-loss model is a widely-used method for analyzing the evolutionary histories of pairs of entities such as hosts and parasites, symbiont species, and species and genes. While efficient algorithms are known for finding maximum parsimony reconciliations, the number of such reconciliations can be exponential in the size of the trees. Since these reconciliations can differ substantially from one another, making inferences from any one reconciliation may lead to conclusions that are not supported, or may even be contradicted, by other maximum parsimony reconciliations. Therefore, there is a need to find small sets of best representative reconciliations when the space of solutions is large and diverse.
resultsWe provide a general framework for hierarchical clustering the space of maximum parsimony reconciliations. We demonstrate this framework for two specific linkage criteria, one that seeks to maximize the average support of the events found in the reconciliations in each cluster and the other that seeks to minimize the distance between reconciliations in each cluster. We analyze the asymptotic worst-case running times and provide experimental results that demonstrate the viability and utility of this approach.
conclusionsThe hierarchical clustering algorithm method proposed here provides a new approach to find a set of representative reconciliations in the potentially vast and diverse space of maximum parsimony reconciliations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.