Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775628›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Hierarchical clustering of maximum parsimony reconciliations.

Ross Mawhorter, Ran Libeskind-Hadas

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On parsimony and clustering.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023
    Article
  5. Phylogenetic reconciliation.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Virulence-Associated Genes ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ross MawhorterDepartment of Computer Science, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA.
Ran Libeskind-HadasDepartment of Computer Science, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, USA. hadas@cs.hmc.edu.

Funding

Harvey Mudd College NANational Science Foundation IIS-1905885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaximum parsimony reconciliation in the duplication-transfer-loss model is a widely-used method for analyzing the evolutionary histories of pairs of entities such as hosts and parasites, symbiont species, and species and genes. While efficient algorithms are known for finding maximum parsimony reconciliations, the number of such reconciliations can be exponential in the size of the trees. Since these reconciliations can differ substantially from one another, making inferences from any one reconciliation may lead to conclusions that are not supported, or may even be contradicted, by other maximum parsimony reconciliations. Therefore, there is a need to find small sets of best representative reconciliations when the space of solutions is large and diverse.

resultsWe provide a general framework for hierarchical clustering the space of maximum parsimony reconciliations. We demonstrate this framework for two specific linkage criteria, one that seeks to maximize the average support of the events found in the reconciliations in each cluster and the other that seeks to minimize the distance between reconciliations in each cluster. We analyze the asymptotic worst-case running times and provide experimental results that demonstrate the viability and utility of this approach.

conclusionsThe hierarchical clustering algorithm method proposed here provides a new approach to find a set of representative reconciliations in the potentially vast and diverse space of maximum parsimony reconciliations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClassificationCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticPhylogenyDuplication-transfer-loss modelMaximum parsimony reconciliationPhylogenetic trees

Identifiers

PMID31775628
PMCPMC6882150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.