Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775607›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Comparative genomics of eight Lactobacillus buchneri strains isolated from food spoilage.

Matthew A Nethery, Emily DeCrescenzo Henriksen, Katheryne V Daughtry, Suzanne D Johanningsmeier, Rodolphe Barrangou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  7. Comparative genomics ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A NetheryGenomic Sciences Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Emily DeCrescenzo HenriksenDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing & Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Katheryne V DaughtryDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing & Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Suzanne D JohanningsmeierUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Area, Food Science Research Unit, North Carolina State University, 322 Schaub Hall, Box 7624, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7624, USA.
Rodolphe BarrangouGenomic Sciences Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. rbarran@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-3504
North Carolina State University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

Agricultural Research Service Internal supportNorth Carolina Ag Foundation Lactobacillus research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactobacillus buchneri is a lactic acid bacterium frequently associated with food bioprocessing and fermentation and has been found to be either beneficial or detrimental to industrial food processes depending on the application. The ability to metabolize lactic acid into acetic acid and 1,2-propandiol makes L. buchneri invaluable to the ensiling process, however, this metabolic activity leads to spoilage in other applications, and is especially damaging to the cucumber fermentation industry. This study aims to augment our genomic understanding of L. buchneri in order to make better use of the species in a wide range of applicable industrial settings.

resultsWhole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on seven phenotypically diverse strains isolated from spoiled, fermented cucumber and the ATCC type strain for L. buchneri, ATCC 4005. Here, we present our findings from the comparison of eight newly-sequenced and assembled genomes against two publicly available closed reference genomes, L. buchneri CD034 and NRRL B-30929. Overall, we see ~ 50% of all coding sequences are conserved across these ten strains. When these coding sequences are clustered by functional description, the strains appear to be enriched in mobile genetic elements, namely transposons. All isolates harbor at least one CRISPR-Cas system, and many contain putative prophage regions, some of which are targeted by the host's own DNA-encoded spacer sequences.

conclusionsOur findings provide new insights into the genomics of L. buchneri through whole genome sequencing and subsequent characterization of genomic features, building a platform for future studies and identifying elements for potential strain manipulation or engineering.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyGenome, BacterialGenomicsComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularFermentationLactobacillusMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyWhole Genome SequencingComparative genomicsCRISPR-Cas systemsFermentationFood microbiologyLactic acid bacteriaLactobacillus buchneriSpoilage

Identifiers

PMID31775607
PMCPMC6881996
OpenAlexW2990943461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.