Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775606›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2019

The evolution of reproductive isolation in Daphnia.

Tiffany A Chin, Carla E Cáceres, Melania E Cristescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The life-history fitness of FInvertebrate biology : a quarterly journal of the American Microscopical Society and the Division of Invertebrate Zoology/ASZ · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiffany A ChinDepartment of Biology, McGill University, 1205 ave Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada. tiffany.chin@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8456-1072
Carla E CáceresSchool of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Melania E CristescuDepartment of Biology, McGill University, 1205 ave Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe process by which populations evolve to become new species involves the emergence of various reproductive isolating barriers (RIB). Despite major advancements in understanding this complex process, very little is known about the order in which RIBs evolve or their relative contribution to the total restriction of gene flow during various stages of speciation. This is mainly due to the difficulties of studying reproductive isolation during the early stages of species formation. This study examines ecological and non-ecological RIB within and between Daphnia pulex and Daphnia pulicaria, two recently diverged species that inhabit distinct habitats and exhibit an unusual level of intraspecific genetic subdivision.

resultsWe find that while ecological prezygotic barriers are close to completion, none of the non-ecological barriers can restrict gene flow between D. pulex and D. pulicaria completely when acting alone. Surprisingly, we also identified high levels of postzygotic reproductive isolation in 'conspecific' interpopulation crosses of D. pulex.

conclusionsWhile the ecological prezygotic barriers are prevalent during the mature stages of speciation, non-ecological barriers likely dominated the early stages of speciation. This finding indicates the importance of studying the very early stages of speciation and suggests the contribution of postzygotic isolation in initiating the process of speciation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAnimalsCrosses, GeneticDaphniaEcologyEcosystemFemaleGene FlowMaleReproductive IsolationDaphnia pulexGene flowGenetic incompatibilitiesPostzygotic isolationPrezygotic isolationSpeciation

Identifiers

PMID31775606
PMCPMC6880586
OpenAlexW2990073235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.