ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
State of the Art of Underwater Active Optical 3D Scanners.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Point Cloud Verification and Scatter Removal Using a Dual Camera/Projector Setup.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Construction of a High-Precision Underwater 3D Reconstruction System Based on Line Laser.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An in situ digital synthesis strategy for the discovery and description of ocean life.Science advances · 2024Article
- Analysis of Polarization Detector Performance Parameters on Polarization 3D Imaging Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: Identifying Critical Issues and Future Perspectives in Image Acquisition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Deep-Learning Based Pipeline for Estimating the Abundance and Size of Aquatic Organisms in an Unconstrained Underwater Environment from Continuously Captured Stereo Video.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Immersion Scanning Technique: A Scalable Low-Cost Solution for 3D Scanning Using Water-Based Fluid.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D Point Cloud Acquisition and Correction in Radioactive and Underwater Environments Using Industrial 3D Scanners.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review of Underwater Sensing Technologies and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Analytical Approach to Sampling Estimation of Underwater Tunnels Using Mechanical Profiling Sonars.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Underwater High-Precision 3D Reconstruction System Based on Rotating Scanning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Hierarchic Treatment of Marine Ecological Information from Spatial Networks of Benthic Platforms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Underwater inspection, maintenance and repair (IMR) operations are being increasingly robotized in order to reduce safety issues and costs. These robotic systems rely on vision sensors to perform fundamental tasks, such as navigation and object recognition and manipulation. Especially, active optical 3D scanners are commonly used due to the domain-specific challenges of underwater imaging. This paper presents an exhaustive survey on the state of the art of optical 3D underwater scanners. A literature review on light projection and light-sensing technologies is presented. Moreover, quantitative performance comparisons of underwater 3D scanners present in the literature and commercial products are carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.