ReviewMicromachines2019
Advanced Polymers for Three-Dimensional (3D) Organ Bioprinting.
Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Precision Surgery: The Role of 3D Printing in Liver Surgery.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2026Article
- 3D Bioprinting and Artificial Intelligence for Tumor Microenvironment Modeling: A Scoping Review of Models, Methods, and Integration Pathways.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Bioengineering 3D Pancreatic Cancer Models with Fibrotic Stroma for In Vitro Cancer Modeling.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Advances in Cryopreservation Strategies for 3D Biofabricated Constructs: From Hydrogels to Bioprinted Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Conceptualization and Preliminary Characterization of Poloxamer-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinting technology innovation in female reproductive system.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Fabrication of k-Carrageenan/Alginate/Carboxymethyl Cellulose basedScaffolds via 3D Printing for Potential Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
- Review
- Three Dimensional Bioprinting for Hepatic Tissue Engineering: From In Vitro Models to Clinical Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Synergistic coupling between 3D bioprinting and vascularization strategies.Biofabrication · 2023Review
- 3D Printing Approaches to Engineer Cardiac Tissue.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Characterization of 3D-Bioprinted In Vitro Lung Cancer Models Using RNA-Sequencing Techniques.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Bioprinting Technologies and Bioinks for Vascular Model Establishment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Toward better drug development: Three-dimensional bioprinting in toxicological research.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- 3D Bioprinting for Pancreas Engineering/Manufacturing.Polymers · 2022Review
- Role of Polymers in Microfluidic Devices.Polymers · 2022Review
- Review
- The Study of 3D Printing-Assisted Electrospinning Technology in Producing Tissue Regeneration Polymer-Fibroin Scaffold for Ureter Repair.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
- Study of Several Alginate-Based Hydrogels for In Vitro 3D Cell Cultures.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) organ bioprinting is an attractive scientific area with huge commercial profit, which could solve all the serious bottleneck problems for allograft transplantation, high-throughput drug screening, and pathological analysis. Integrating multiple heterogeneous adult cell types and/or stem cells along with other biomaterials (e.g., polymers, bioactive agents, or biomolecules) to make 3D constructs functional is one of the core issues for 3D bioprinting of bioartificial organs. Both natural and synthetic polymers play essential and ubiquitous roles for hierarchical vascular and neural network formation in 3D printed constructs based on their specific physical, chemical, biological, and physiological properties. In this article, several advanced polymers with excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, 3D printability, and structural stability are reviewed. The challenges and perspectives of polymers for rapid manufacturing of complex organs, such as the liver, heart, kidney, lung, breast, and brain, are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.