Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775182›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2020

Alarm communication networks as a driver of community structure in African savannah herbivores.

Kristine Meise, Daniel W Franks, Jakob Bro-Jørgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Horses (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Fast behavioral feedbacks make ecosystems sensitive to pace and not just magnitude of anthropogenic environmental change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Mixed-species herding levels the landscape of fear.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristine MeiseMammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-8384
Daniel W FranksDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-7470
Jakob Bro-JørgensenMammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-8477

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council 1;Natural Environment Research Council 14Natural Environment Research Council 3377Natural Environment Research Council 39Natural Environment Research Council 5001Natural Environment Research Council 5838Natural Environment Research Council L007185/1Natural Environment Research Council L007266/1;Natural Environment Research Council NE/
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social information networks have the potential to shape the spatial structure of ecological communities by promoting the formation of mixed-species groups. However, what actually drives social affinity between species in the wild will depend on the characteristics of the species available to group. Here we first present an agent-based model that predicts trait-related survival benefits from mixed-species group formation in a multi-species community and we then test the model predictions in a community-wide field study of African savannah herbivores using multi-layered network analysis. We reveal benefits from information transfer about predators as a key determinant of mixed-species group formation, and that dilution benefits alone are not enough to explain patterns in interspecific sociality. The findings highlight the limitations of classical ecological approaches focusing only on direct trophic interactions when analysing community structure and suggest that declines in species occupying central social network positions, such as key informants, can have significant repercussions throughout communities.

Indexed as

EcologyHerbivoryBiotaAgent-based modellingantipredator strategiesinterspecific information transfermixed-species groupsresource competitionsocial affinitysocial information usesocial network analysisspatial ecologyungulates

Identifiers

PMID31775182
PMCPMC6973068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.