Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31775047›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

Fibroblastic Reticular Cells Control Conduit Matrix Deposition during Lymph Node Expansion.

Victor G Martinez, Valeriya Pankova, Lukas Krasny, Tanya Singh, Spyridon Makris, Ian J White, Agnesska C Benjamin, Simone Dertschnig, Harry L Horsnell, Janos Kriston-Vizi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victor G MartinezStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Valeriya PankovaStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Lukas KrasnyDivision of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Tanya SinghBioinformatics Image Core, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Spyridon MakrisStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Ian J WhiteElectron Microscopy Facility, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Agnesska C BenjaminStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Simone DertschnigUCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Harry L HorsnellStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Janos Kriston-ViziBioinformatics Image Core, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Jemima J BurdenElectron Microscopy Facility, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Paul H HuangDivision of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Christopher J TapeCell Communication Lab, Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Sophie E ActonStromal Immunology Group, MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: s.acton@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19281Cancer Research UK 19763Cancer Research UK 23783Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0800785Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph nodes (LNs) act as filters, constantly sampling peripheral cues. This is facilitated by the conduit network, a tubular structure of aligned extracellular matrix (ECM) fibrils ensheathed by fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs). LNs undergo rapid 3- to 5-fold expansion during adaptive immune responses, but these ECM-rich structures are not permanently damaged. Whether conduit flow or filtering function is affected during LN expansion is unknown. Here, we show that conduits are partially disrupted during acute LN expansion, but FRC-FRC contacts remain connected. We reveal that polarized FRCs deposit ECM basolaterally using LL5-β and that ECM production is regulated at transcriptional and secretory levels by the C-type lectin CLEC-2, expressed by dendritic cells. Inflamed LNs maintain conduit size exclusion, and flow is disrupted but persists, indicating the robustness of this structure despite rapid tissue expansion. We show how dynamic communication between peripheral tissues and LNs provides a mechanism to prevent inflammation-induced fibrosis in lymphoid tissue.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixFibroblastsLymph NodesCLEC-2conduitextracellular matrixfibroblastic reticular cellslymph nodemicrotubulespleckstrin homology-like domain family B member 2podoplaninpolarity

Identifiers

PMID31775047
PMCPMC6899512
OpenAlexW2990280215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.