Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31774485›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2020

Economic Evaluation of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Treatment as Usual for Suicidal US Army Soldiers.

Samantha L Bernecker, Kelly L Zuromski, Justin C Curry, Jane J Kim, Peter M Gutierrez, Thomas E Joiner, Ronald C Kessler, Matthew K Nock, M David Rudd, Craig J Bryan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samantha L BerneckerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly L ZuromskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Justin C CurryPsychological Health Center of Excellence, Research and Development Directorate (J-9), Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Jane J KimDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter M GutierrezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Thomas E JoinerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
M David RuddNational Center for Veterans Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Craig J BryanNational Center for Veterans Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Funding

Modifiable Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Behaviors in the US ArmyU01MH087981 · NIMH · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI STEIN, MURRAY B., URSANO, ROBERT J. · 2009 to 2013
$65.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH087981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) is a clinically effective intervention for reducing risk of suicide attempts among suicidal US Army soldiers. However, because specialized treatments can be resource intensive, more information is needed on costs and benefits of BCBT compared with existing treatments. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BCBT compared with treatment as usual for suicidal soldiers in the US Army. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision analytic model compared effects and costs of BCBT vs treatment as usual from a US Department of Defense (DoD) perspective. Model input data were drawn from epidemiologic data sets and a clinical trial among suicidal soldiers conducted from January 31, 2011, to April 3, 2014. Data were analyzed from July 3, 2018, to March 25, 2019. Interventions: The strategies compared were treatment as usual alone vs treatment as usual plus 12 individual BCBT sessions. Treatment as usual could include a range of pharmacologic and psychological treatment options. Main Outcomes and Measures: Costs in 2017 US dollars, suicide attempts averted (self-directed behavior with intent to die, but with nonfatal outcome), suicide deaths averted, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, assuming a 2-year time horizon for treatment differences but including lifetime costs. Results: In the base-case analysis, BCBT was expected to avert approximately 23 to 25 more suicide attempts and 1 to 3 more suicide deaths per 100 patients treated than treatment as usual. Sensitivity analyses assuming a range of treatment effects showed BCBT to be cost saving in most scenarios. Using the federal discount rate, the DoD was estimated to save from $15 000 to $16 630 per patient with BCBT vs treatment as usual. In a worst-case scenario (ie, assuming the weakest plausible BCBT effect sizes), BCBT cost an additional $1910 to $2250 per patient compared with treatment as usual. Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest BCBT may be a cost-saving intervention for suicidal active-duty soldiers. The costs of ensuring treatment fidelity would also need to be considered when assessing the implications of disseminating BCBT across the entire DoD.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAdolescentAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPsychotherapy, BriefSuicide, AttemptedSuicide, CompletedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31774485
PMCPMC6902192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.