Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31774396›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.

Ciara A Devine, Christine Gaffney, Gerard M Loughnane, Simon P Kelly, Redmond G O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Movement-Independent Signature of Urgency during Human Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neurophysiology of Perceptual Decision-Making and Its Alterations in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Congruent versus Incongruent Distractor Positioning on Electrophysiological Signals during Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ciara A DevineTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, The University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-1172
Christine GaffneyTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, The University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard M LoughnaneNational College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-5294
Simon P KellySchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and UCD Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-3595
Redmond G O'ConnellTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, The University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6949-2793

Funding

H2020 European Research Council Starting Grant 63829Irish Research Council Postgraduate FellowshipNational Science Foundation BCS-1358955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computations and neural processes underpinning decision making have primarily been investigated using highly simplified tasks in which stimulus onsets cue observers to start accumulating choice-relevant information. Yet, in daily life we are rarely afforded the luxury of knowing precisely when choice-relevant information will appear. Here, we examined neural indices of decision formation while subjects discriminated subtle stimulus feature changes whose timing relative to stimulus onset ('foreperiod') was uncertain. Joint analysis of behavioural error patterns and neural decision signal dynamics indicated that subjects systematically began the accumulation process before any informative evidence was presented, and further, that accumulation onset timing varied systematically as a function of the foreperiod of the preceding trial. These results suggest that the brain can adjust to temporal uncertainty by strategically modulating accumulation onset timing according to statistical regularities in the temporal structure of the sensory environment with particular emphasis on recent experience.

Indexed as

Neurophysiological MonitoringAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionDecision MakingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeUncertaintyVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcentroparietal positivitydecision onset timingelectroencephalographyhumanneuroscienceperceptual decision makingtemporal uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID31774396
PMCPMC6904213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.