ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bioactive three-layered skin substitute based on ECM components effectively promotes skin wound healing and regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Recent Developments and Applications of 3D-Printing Technology in Pharmaceutical Drug Delivery Systems: A New Research Direction and Future Trends.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Spatiotemporal application of small molecules in fracture healing.Biomaterials translational · 2025Review
- Bioprinted Hydrogels for Fibrosis and Wound Healing: Treatment and Modeling.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Sustainable Applications of Animal Waste Proteins.Polymers · 2022Review
- 3D-Printed Gelatin-Alginate Hydrogel Dressings for Burn Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Study.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- 3D-Printed Products for Topical Skin Applications: From Personalized Dressings to Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.Progress in polymer science · 2021Article
- Innovative bioinks for 3D bioprinting: Exploring technological potential and regulatory challenges.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratin is a natural material that can be derived from the cortex of human hair. Our group had previously presented a method for the printed, sequential production of three-dimensional (3D) keratin scaffolds. Using a riboflavin-sodium persulfate-hydroquinone (initiator-catalyst-inhibitor) photosensitive solution, we produced 3D keratin-based constructs through ultraviolet crosslinking in a lithography-based 3D printer. In this study, we have used this bioink to produce a keratin-based construct that is capable of delivering small molecules, providing an environment conducive to healing of dermal burn wounds
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.