ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2020
Filament inadequate wall apposition of the different ends of flow diverters in the abdominal aorta of rabbits.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Resolution C-arm Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Stent Expansion and Apposition after Intracranial Stent Implantation.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlow diverters (FDs) with flared ends (FEs) or straight ends (SEs) are used either alone or when overlapped to treat complex intracranial aneurysms. We evaluated filament inadequate wall apposition (IWA) of the FEs and SEs of FDs in vivo.
methodsA total of 24 FDs with FEs and SEs were placed in an overlapping manner in the abdominal aortae of six rabbits (two sets per rabbit). Digital subtraction angiography was performed immediately after stent insertion and three months later. The anatomical and histopathological aortic features at FEs and SEs were evaluated.
resultsAngiography revealed no significant difference in terms of changes in arterial diameter between the FE and SE groups (
conclusionsBoth the FEs and SEs of FDs can exhibit IMA. IWA events are reduced at the overlapped regions. On pathological evaluation, FEs increased neo-intimal thicknesses more than SEs did, but hyperplasia was minimal on angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.