Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773869›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2020

It takes a village: An empirical analysis of how husbands, mothers-in-law, health workers, and mothers influence breastfeeding practices in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Melissa F Young, Phuong Nguyen, Shivani Kachwaha, Lan Tran Mai, Sebanti Ghosh, Rajeev Agrawal, Jessica Escobar-Alegria, Purnima Menon, Rasmi Avula

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa F YoungHubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2768-1673
Phuong NguyenPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3418-1674
Shivani KachwahaPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA.
Lan Tran MaiFHI360, Washington, DC, USA.
Sebanti GhoshFHI360, Washington, DC, USA.
Rajeev AgrawalFHI360, Washington, DC, USA.
Jessica Escobar-AlegriaFHI360, Washington, DC, USA.
Purnima MenonPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA.
Rasmi AvulaPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA.
Family Health International 360 · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence on strategies to improve infant and young child feeding in India, a country that carries the world's largest burden of undernutrition, is limited. In the context of a programme evaluation in two districts in Uttar Pradesh, we sought to understand the multiple influences on breastfeeding practices and to model potential programme influence on improving breastfeeding. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,838 recently delivered women, 1,194 husbands, and 1,353 mothers/mothers-in-law. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between key determinants (maternal, household, community, and health services) and breastfeeding outcomes [early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF)], prelacteal feed, and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). We used population attributable risk analysis to estimate potential improvement in breastfeeding practices. Breastfeeding practices were suboptimal: EIBF (26.3%), EBF (54%), and prelacteal feeding (33%). EIBF was positively associated with maternal knowledge, counselling during pregnancy/delivery, and vaginal delivery at a health facility. Prelacteal feeds were less likely to be given when mothers had higher knowledge, beliefs and self-efficacy, delivered at health facility, and mothers/mothers-in-law had attended school. EBF was positively associated with maternal knowledge, beliefs and self-efficacy, parity, and socio-economic status. High maternal stress and domestic violence contributed to lower EBF. Under optimal programme implementation, we estimate EIBF can be improved by 25%, prelacteal feeding can be reduced by 25%, and EBF can be increased by 23%. A multifactorial approach, including maternal-, health service-, family-, and community-level interventions has the potential to lead to significant improvements in breastfeeding practices in Uttar Pradesh.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBreast FeedingCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaMothersSpousesbreastfeeding initiationexclusive breastfeedingIndiaprelacteal feedprogrammeUttar Pradesh

Identifiers

PMID31773869
PMCPMC7083414
OpenAlexW2991174716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.