Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773633›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2020

Surgical management considerations in cystic prolactinomas-a single center case series.

Edin Nevzati, Grégoire P Chatain, Steven B Carr, Kevin O Lillehei, Janice M Kerr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Therapeutic challenges of giant invasive cystic macroprolactinoma.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surgical Management of Giant Prolactinomas: A Descriptive Study.International journal of endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  7. Treatment of Prolactinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edin NevzatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. edin.nevzati@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-0290
Grégoire P ChatainDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Steven B CarrDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.
Kevin O LilleheiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Janice M KerrDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal treatment of prolactinomas with a predominantly cystic component remains poorly defined. The cystic tumor component is considered to respond less favorably to medical treatment, thereby advocating surgical management. The purpose of this study was to assess remission rates in surgically treated cystic prolactinomas, and to compare outcomes to similarly treated solid micro- and macroprolactinomas.

methodsClinical and imaging data were retrospectively compiled from 56 patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection, for symptomatic prolactinomas, from 2004 to 2018, at a single academic institution. Pituitary adenomas were subdivided according to tumor size and tumor consistency: cystic prolactinomas (>50% cystic tumor component) n = 17; solid microprolactinomas (<10 mm) n = 10; and solid macroprolactinomas (≥10 mm) n = 29. Remission was defined as a prolactin level of <10 ng/dl either immediately postoperative or at a later time point.

resultsMedian tumor size was 15 mm for cystic prolactinomas, 7 mm for solid microprolactinomas, and 25.5 mm for solid macroprolactinomas. Remission was achieved in 76% (n = 13/17) of surgically treated cystic prolactinomas, 100% (n = 10/10) of solid microprolactinomas, and 24% (n = 7/29) of solid macroprolactinomas. More than 44% of solid macroprolactinomas had a Knosp grade > 3, while most cystic prolactinomas (93.8%) and all solid microprolactinomas (100%) had a Knosp grade ≤ 2.

conclusionsDespite their large tumor size (≥10 mm), high remission rates can be expected with surgically treated cystic prolactinomas. This case series of cystic prolactinomas demonstrates the successful use of transsphenoidal surgery as a favorable, and a potentially curative alternative to dopaminergic therapy in this patient population.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaDopamine AgonistsHumansProlactinRetrospective StudiesDopamine AgonistsProlactinCystic prolactinomaMacroprolactinomaMicroprolactinomaSurgical remissionTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID31773633
OpenAlexW2990991585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.