ArticleNeurocritical care2020
Impact of a Devastating Brain Injury Pathway on Outcomes, Resources, and Organ Donation: 3 Years' Experience in a Regional Neurosciences ICU.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Education and Ethical Guidance for Organ Donation at the End-of-Life: An Ethical Guidance Statement from the Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Associations of Vasopressin and Corticosteroid Therapy with Organ Yield in Brain-Dead Donors: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Resuscitation and Initial Management After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Questions for the On-Call Shift.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Intensive care admission aiming at organ donation. Pro.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Assessing Outcomes of Patients Subject to Intensive Care to Facilitate Organ Donation: A Spanish Multicenter Prospective Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Article
- Brain herniation on computed tomography is a poor predictor of whether patients with a devastating brain injury can be confirmed dead using neurological criteria.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the impact of introducing a devastating brain injury (DBI) pathway on patient outcome, intensive care unit (ICU) resources, and organ donation practice in the first 3 years of implementation in a regional neurosciences ICU in the South West of England.
methodsPatients with DBI admitted to our ICU between 2015 and 2018 were identified from our ICU database and their outcomes compared to those of non-DBI patients. Data were also obtained from the national potential donor audit to compare organ donation metrics before and after the introduction of the DBI pathway. Organ donation metrics in DBI patients and non-DBI patients were compared once the pathway had been implemented.
resultsWe admitted 85 DBI patients (1.3% of all admissions), with a significantly shorter median length of ICU stay than in non-DBI patients, 1.14 versus 2.93 days (p < 0.001). Decisions for withdraw life-sustaining treatments (WLST) were made significantly earlier in DBI patients, median 26.2 versus 84.8 h (p < 0.001). Over 8% of DBI patients survived, while 31% progressed to brain death compared to 7.1% in the general population (p < 0.001), and 25% become solid organ donors compared to 1.3% of the general population (p < 0.001). There was an increase in the proportion of donors after brain death (DBD) to donors after circulatory death (DCD) in the 3 years following the introduction of the DBI pathway (p = 0.024). There was also an increased proportion of DBD donors to DCD donors of 76% versus 24% in the DBI group compared to 62% versus 38% (p = 0,002) in the non-DBI population. Prognostic scoring systems do not provide accurate estimates of survival rate in this population.
conclusionsAdmitting patients with perceived DBI to ICU and avoiding the early WLST allows identification of unexpected survivors and gives families more time in decision making at the end of life. The DBI pathway increases the potential for organ donation and increases the proportion of DBD donors. These benefits outweigh the small impact of a DBI pathway on ICU resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.