ArticleImmunologic research2019
Combined prime-boost immunization with systemic and mucosal pneumococcal vaccines based on Pneumococcal surface protein A to enhance protection against lethal pneumococcal infections.
Article in Immunologic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Case for Pneumococcal Surface Protein A (PspA): A Comprehensive Review of a Leading Candidate in Pneumococcal Vaccine Research.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Cyclic di AMP phosphodiesterase nanovaccine elicits protective immunity against Burkholderia cenocepacia infection in mice.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Bacterium-like Particles fromVaccines · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 spike-FLIPr fusion protein plus lipidated FLIPr protects against various SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters.Journal of virology · 2024Article
- A novel bacterium-like particles platform displaying antigens by new anchoring proteins induces efficacious immune responses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- In-silico design and evaluation of an epitope-based serotype-independent promising vaccine candidate for highly cross-reactive regions of pneumococcal surface protein A.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Intranasally inoculated bacterium-like particles displaying porcine epidemic diarrhea virus S1 protein induced intestinal mucosal immune response in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- GEM-PA-Based Subunit Vaccines of Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Induces Systemic Immune Responses in Mice.Viruses · 2022Article
- Novel Pneumococcal Protein-Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine Based on Biotin-Streptavidin.Infection and immunity · 2022Article
- Novel LysM motifs for antigen display on lactobacilli for mucosal immunization.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited protective effects of commercially available vaccines necessitate the development of novel pneumococcal vaccines. We recently reported a pneumococcal systemic vaccine containing two proteins, Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA of family 1 and 2) and a bacterium-like particle-based pneumococcal mucosal vaccine containing PspA2 and PspA4 fragments, both eliciting broad protective immune responses. We had previously reported that subcutaneous (s.c.+s.c.+s.c.) immunization with the systemic vaccine induced more pronounced humoral serum IgG responses, while intranasal (i.n.+i.n.+i.n.) immunization with the mucosal vaccine elicited a more pronounced mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) response. We hypothesized that a combinatorial administration of the two vaccines might elicit more pronounced and broader protective immune responses. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of combinatorial prime-boost immunization using both systemic and mucosal vaccines for a pneumococcal infection. Combinatorial prime-boost immunization (s.c.+i.n. and i.n.+s.c.) induced not only IgG, but also mucosal sIgA production at high levels. Systemic priming and mucosal boosting immunization (s.c.+i.n.) provided markedly better protection than homologous prime-boost immunization (s.c.+s.c.+s.c. and i.n.+i.n.+i.n.). Moreover, it induced more robust Th1 and Th17 cell-mediated immune responses than mucosal priming and systemic boosting immunization (i.n.+s.c.). These results indicate that combinatorial prime-boost immunization potentially induces a robust systemic and mucosal immune response, making it an optimal alternative for maximum protection against lethal pneumococcal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.