Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773425›Full record

Observational studyFamilial cancer2020

'We don't know for sure': discussion of uncertainty concerning multigene panel testing during initial cancer genetic consultations.

Niki M Medendorp, Marij A Hillen, Pomme E A van Maarschalkerweerd, Cora M Aalfs, Margreet G E M Ausems, Senno Verhoef, Lizet E van der Kolk, Lieke P V Berger, Marijke R Wevers, Anja Wagner and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Niki M MedendorpDepartment of Medical Psychology - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.m.medendorp@amsterdamumc.nl.
Marij A HillenDepartment of Medical Psychology - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pomme E A van MaarschalkerweerdDepartment of Medical Psychology - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cora M AalfsDepartment of Clinical Genetics - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margreet G E M AusemsDivision of Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Senno VerhoefDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lizet E van der KolkFamily Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieke P V BergerDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marijke R WeversDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anja WagnerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara A H CaanenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Anne M StiggelboutMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-test counseling about multigene panel testing involves many uncertainties. Ideally, counselees are informed about uncertainties in a way that enables them to make an informed decision about panel testing. It is presently unknown whether and how uncertainty is discussed during initial cancer genetic counseling. We therefore investigated whether and how counselors discuss and address uncertainty, and the extent of shared decision-making (SDM), and explored associations between counselors' communication and their characteristics in consultations on panel testing for cancer. For this purpose, consultations of counselors discussing a multigene panel with a simulated patient were videotaped. Simulated patients represented a counselee who had had multiple cancer types, according to a script. Before and afterwards, counselors completed a survey. Counselors' uncertainty expressions, initiating and the framing of expressions, and their verbal responses to scripted uncertainties of the simulated patient were coded by two researchers independently. Coding was done according to a pre-developed coding scheme using The Observer XT software for observational analysis. Additionally, the degree of SDM was assessed by two observers. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to assess associations of communicated uncertainties, responses and the extent of SDM, with counselors' background characteristics. In total, twenty-nine counselors, including clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, physician assistants-in-training, residents and interns, participated of whom working experience varied between 0 and 25 years. Counselors expressed uncertainties mainly regarding scientific topics (94%) and on their own initiative (95%). Most expressions were framed directly (77%), e.g. We don't know, and were emotionally neutral (59%; without a positive/negative value). Counselors mainly responded to uncertainties of the simulated patient by explicitly referring to the uncertainty (69%), without providing space for further disclosure (66%). More experienced counselors provided less space to further disclose uncertainty (p < 0.02), and clinical geneticists scored lower on SDM compared with other types of counselors (p < 0.03). Our findings that counselors mainly communicate scientific uncertainties and use space-reducing responses imply that the way counselors address counselees' personal uncertainties and concerns during initial cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingUncertaintyAdultCommunicationCounselorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGeneticsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritanceNeoplasmsAmbiguousGenetic counselorsGenetic testingInformation provisionSimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID31773425
PMCPMC7026220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.