Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773417›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2020

[Quality improvement in conservative pain management (QUIKS) : A module of the QUIPS project for benchmarking of pain treatment in patients with nonoperative care].

Joachim Erlenwein, Christopher Bertemes, Steffen Kunsch, Antje Göttermann, Marcus Komann, Lars Sturm, Frank Petzke, Winfried Meißner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joachim ErlenweinKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. joachim.erlenwein@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Christopher BertemesKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Steffen KunschKlinik für Gastroenterologie und Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Antje GöttermannKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Marcus KomannKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Lars SturmKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Schmerztherapie und Interdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle, Deutschland.
Frank PetzkeKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Winfried MeißnerKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational and international surveys have shown that the quality of pain therapy in hospitals shows deficits, especially in the nonoperative disciplines.

objectiveThe objective was to develop and clinically validate a module for the outcome and process parameters for pain management in patients in the context of a conservative/nonoperative hospital treatment analogous to the QUIPS questionnaire (quality improvement in postoperative pain therapy), which focuses on postoperative pain management. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a 4-step procedure the QUIPS outcome questionnaire and the process assessment sheet of the QUIPS module were adapted to the conditions of conservative/nonoperative treatment. Patients from internal medicine, neurology and dermatology took part in the systematic testing and the clinical validation.

resultsA total of 973 patients were enrolled (inclusion rate 74%, n = 403 internal medicine, n = 401 neurology, n = 169 dermatology). The majority completed the questionnaire independently while 33% of the patients needed support, which was given in the form of an interview. Apart from a few deficits, most questions about pain intensity and function were fully recorded. The evaluation of the outcome was difficult as regardless of the pain therapy, a relevant proportion of the patients reported no pain. Due to the lack of conclusive diagnoses at the time of the assessment, organ-related disease groups were developed using word diagnoses instead of the OPS coding used in QUIPS.

conclusionIn addition to the perioperative modules of QUIPS, QUIKS (quality improvement in conservative pain management), an instrument for quality assurance of pain treatment in patients in nonoperative disciplines, is now available.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingPain ManagementQuality ImprovementHumansPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAcute pain therapyBenchmarkingPain managementQuality assuranceQuality indicator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.