Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773413›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

The expansion and validation of a new upper extremity item bank for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS).

Aaron J Kaat, Chester Trip Buckenmaier, Karon F Cook, Nan E Rothrock, Benjamin D Schalet, Richard C Gershon, Mark S Vrahas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS®) physical function and its derivative measures in adults: a systematic review of content validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Content analysis of PROMIS physical function banks using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaron J KaatDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. aaron.kaat@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-1899
Chester Trip BuckenmaierUniformed Services University, Defense & Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, 11300 Rockville Pike #709, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA.
Karon F CookDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Nan E RothrockDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Benjamin D SchaletDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Richard C GershonDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Mark S VrahasDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Mark Goodson Building, 444 S. San Vicente Blvd., #603, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Funding

The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878NCI NIH HHS U2CCA186878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) includes a Physical Function (PF) item bank and an Upper Extremity (UE) item bank, which is composed of a subset of items from the PF bank. The UE item bank has few items and known ceiling effects. Therefore, this study aimed to expand the item bank to assess a wider range of functioning. With the additional content, other psychometric properties-improved content validity, item bank depth, range of measurement, and score reliability-were also evaluated. We convened an expert panel to review potential items, and then conducted psychometric analyses on both extant and newly-collected data.

resultsExpert focus groups reviewed the PF item bank for items that were "sufficiently" related to upper extremity functioning for inclusion in the expanded UE item bank. The candidate item bank was quantitatively evaluated in a new sample of 600 people. The final items were calibrated in an aggregated dataset (n = 11,635) from two existing datasets, and the newly collected sample. The original UE item bank included 15 items. After expert review and quantitative evaluation, 31 items were added. The combined 46 items were calibrated using item response theory (IRT). Then computer adaptive tests (CATs) were simulated based off of the psychometric results. These indicated that the new UE item bank has an extended measurement range compared to the original version.

conclusionsThe expanded PROMIS UE item bank assesses a wider range of upper extremity functioning compared to the initial UE item bank. However, ceiling effects remain a concern for unimpaired groups. The new UE item bank is recommended for individuals with known or suspected upper extremity limitations.

Indexed as

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information systemPhysical functionPROMISUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID31773413
PMCPMC6879697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.