Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773347›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2019

The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: long-term outcomes of a single institution prospective study.

M Dessily, M Dziubeck, E Chahidi, V Simonelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07408414 (Procjena Postoperativne Boli Konvencionalnom i Tumescentnom Anestezijom u Laserskom Tretmanu Pilonidalnog Sinusa), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07408414 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Procjena Postoperativne Boli Konvencionalnom i Tumescentnom Anestezijom u Laserskom Tretmanu Pilonidalnog Sinusa

TypeinterventionalSponsorOpća županijska bolnica PožegaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsPilonidal Cyst and Sinus Without Abscess, Pilonidal Sinus Disease, Pilonidal Sinus Treatment, Laser AblationArmslocal anesthesia using 2% lidocaine, SiLaC, Questionnaire and physical examination, Tumescent local anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Efficacy of laser obliteration with limited excision of pilonidal sinus.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M DessilyDepartment of Coloproctology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Tivoli, 34 Avenue Max Buzet, 7100, La Louvière, Belgium. michael.dessily@chu-tivoli.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-8137
M DziubeckDepartment of General Surgery, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Tivoli, La Louvière, Belgium.
E ChahidiDepartment of General Surgery, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Tivoli, La Louvière, Belgium.
V SimonelliDepartment of Coloproctology and Digestive Surgery, CHU Tivoli, 34 Avenue Max Buzet, 7100, La Louvière, Belgium.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014, we started to treat pilonidal sinus disease in our institution with sinus laser-assisted closure (SiLaC) procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SiLaC procedure in a single institution prospective study on a large cohort of patients and with a long follow-up period, and try to determine what factors that could influence healing and recurrence.

methodsA prospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease operated on with the SiLaC procedure at our institution from March 2015 to August 2017. Demographic and surgical data, outcomes, and complications were prospectively recorded and compared between the healed and not healed/recurrence groups to find factors influencing healing. Postoperative follow-up was performed in the outpatient clinic every 2 weeks for 2 months. In March 2018, patients were questioned by mail or phone to assess long-term recurrences.

resultsThere were 200 patients. The healing rate was high (94%) with a mean healing time of 19.5 ± 14.4 days. Mean operative time (9.4 ± 2.6 min) and mean duration of postoperative analgesic therapy (4.72 ± 5.64 days) were short. Postoperative complications (15%) were mainly infection (9.5%). There was a response rate of 77.5% to mail/phone questionnaires about recurrence. The recurrence rate was 14.9%. Mean time until recurrence was 193.5 ± 87.19 days. The incidence of secondary openings, complications, and infection in the healing vs not healed or recurrence groups, was 24.8% vs 56.6%, 19.2% vs 40%, and 8.8% vs 30%, respectively.

conclusionsSiLaC is an effective, easy to perform, reproducible, and almost painless procedure. Factors influencing healing seem to be the presence of secondary openings, postoperative complications, and, especially, infection. The SiLaC procedure could become one of the treatments of choice for pilonidal sinus disease.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyAcetaminophenAdolescentAdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePilonidal SinusPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurgical Wound InfectionAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticLaserPilonidal diseasePilonidal sinusSiLaCSurgeryTechnique

Identifiers

PMID31773347
OpenAlexW2990502282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.