ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019
Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD).
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nationwide Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Korea: Insights From the Korean Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Incidence and Determinants of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy With Loss of and Impaired Consciousness.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- Hybrid catheter ablation and minimally invasive LVAD implantation in a high-risk patient with refractory ventricular tachycardia.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Postoperative care of 14 patients with left ventricular assist devices: a case series.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Critical Care Management of Electrical Storm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator noise following left ventricular assist device implantation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- Mechanistic assessment and ablation of left ventricular assist device related ventricular tachycardia in patients with severe heart failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Oral milrinone for management of refractory right ventricular failure in patients with left ventricular assist devices.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- A stable patient with a left ventricular assist device was admitted to the outpatient clinic with ventricular fibrillation.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Hybrid Catheter-Based and Surgical Techniques for Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2020Review
- Ventricular Fibrillation 7 Years After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
- Commentary: Arrhythmia surgery at the time of left ventricular assist device implant-use of caution.JTCVS techniques · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a well-known treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy and is recognized both as bridge to transplant and a destination therapy. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is common after LVAD implantation. We review the pathophysiology and recent advances in the management of VA in LVAD patients. RECENT
findingsVAs are most likely to occur in the early post-operative periods after LVAD implantation and a prior history of VA is the most important risk factor. Post-LVAD VAs are usually well tolerated with less morbidity and decreased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, risk of right heart failure in the setting of persistent VAs is being increasingly recognized. The mechanisms of post-LVAD VAs may vary depending on the time from LVAD implantation. Electrical remodeling may play an important role in the immediate post-implant phase. Preexisting myocardial scar and to a lesser extent mechanical irritation from the LVAD cannula are important in the later phases. Most LVAD patients have a previously placed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The benefit of implanting a new ICD in LVAD patients is unknown and should be individualized. For ICD programming, a conservative strategy with higher detection zones and prolonged time to detection is usually recommended aiming to minimize ICD shocks. More aggressive programming is appropriate if the VA results in hemodynamic instability. Antiarrhythmic drugs including amiodarone, mexiletine, and beta blockers are usually the first-line therapy for VAs. Catheter ablation has been shown to be safe and effective in LVAD recipients with recurrent VAs not responsive to antiarrhythmic drugs. LVAD-related VA is most frequently reentrant secondary to myocardial scar and usually well tolerated. Management options include antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.