Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773291›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2019

Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: a Review.

Abhinav R Changa, Barry M Czeisler, Aaron S Lord

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Brain Abscesses in the Tropics.Current tropical medicine reports · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Traumatic brain injury].Der Nervenarzt · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A Rare Cause of Headache and an Unorthodox Transfer: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhinav R ChangaDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone, 222 East 41st Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-0518
Barry M CzeislerDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone, 222 East 41st Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Aaron S LordDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone, 222 East 41st Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. Aaron.Lord@nyulangone.org.
NYU Langone Health · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPrinciples of intracranial pressure (ICP) management continue to be an essential part of the neurointensivist's skillset as appropriate treatment decisions can prevent secondary injury to the central nervous system. This review of the literature aims to: discuss commonly encountered pathologies associated with increased ICP, summarize diagnostic approaches used in evaluating ICP, and present evidence-based treatment paradigms that drive clinical care in intensive care units. RECENT

findingsRecent topics of discussion include invasive and non-invasive modalities of diagnosis and monitoring, recent developments in hypothermia, hyperosmolar therapy, pharmacological interventions, and surgical therapies. The authors also present an example of an algorithm used within our system of hospitals for managing patients with elevated ICP. Recent advances have shown the mortality benefits in appropriately recognizing and treating increased ICP. Multiple modalities of treatment have been explored, and evidence has shown benefit in some. Further work continues to provide clarity in the appropriate management of intracranial hypertension.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementElectroencephalographyHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureOptic NerveHyperosmolar therapyHypothermiaIntracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressureOptic nerve sheath diameterPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID31773291
OpenAlexW2990768575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.