ArticlePediatric surgery international2020
Assessing surgical care delivery at facilities caring for higher volumes of minority children utilizing the pediatric quality indicator for perforated appendicitis: a propensity-matched analysis.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe pediatric quality indicator (PDI) measures released by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) provide an impetus for benchmarking quality of care in children. The PDI-17, aimed at studying perforation in appendicitis, is one such measure that this study aims to utilize to assess surgical care delivery and outcomes in children managed at majority-minority hospitals.
methodsThe Kid Inpatient Database (2000-2012) was queried for pediatric patients (< 18 years) with a diagnosis of appendicitis, with and without perforation. Facilities were categorized into tertiles based on rates of perforation (PDI-17). Similarly, tertiles were generated based on volume of minority patients (Black and Hispanic) treated at each facility. Multivariable regression analysis adjusted for demographic parameters, hospital-level characteristics, propensity score quintiles, clinically relevant outcomes, and tertiles of minority patients treated.
resultsOf the 322,805 patients with appendicitis 28.7% had perforated appendicitis. Patients presenting to facilities caring for a higher volume of perforated appendicitis were younger with public insurance or no insurance and, however, these patients were less likely to belong to a minority group (p < 0.05). Additionally, these patients were less likely to belong to the highest income quartile (OR [95% CI] 0.45 [0.39-0.52]). Hospitals treating the highest volume of minority patients [majority-minority hospitals (MMHs)] had an 87% (OR [95% CI] 1.87 [1.77-1.98]) increased likelihood of also treating the highest rates of perforated appendicitis.
conclusionHospitals treating a high volume of complicated appendicitis are less likely to care for minority groups. Additionally, MMHs lacking experience and volume in caring for complicated appendicitis have an increased likelihood of patients with perforations which is indicative of poor healthcare access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.