Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773148›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2020

Mindfulness and Meditative Movement Interventions for Men Living With Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

C Graham Ford, Kevin E Vowles, Bruce W Smith, Anita Y Kinney

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meditative movement for breathlessness in advanced COPD or cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C Graham FordDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Bruce W SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Anita Y KinneySchool of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
University of New Mexico · USQueen's University Belfast · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Biobehavioral Effects of Qigong for Prostate Cancer Survivors with FatigueR01CA203930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI IRWIN, MICHAEL R, KINNEY, ANITA Y. · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMindfulness-based interventions, Tai Chi/Qigong, and Yoga (defined here as meditative cancer interventions [MCIs]) have demonstrated small to medium effects on psychosocial outcomes in female breast cancer patients. However, no summary exists of how effective these interventions are for men with cancer. PURPOSE: A meta-analysis was performed to determine the effectiveness of MCIs on psychosocial outcomes (e.g., quality of life, depression, and posttraumatic growth) for men with cancer.

methodsA literature search yielded 17 randomized controlled trials (N = 666) meeting study inclusion criteria. The authors were contacted to request data for male participants in the study when not reported.

resultsWith the removal of one outlier, there was a small effect found in favor of MCIs across all psychosocial outcomes immediately postintervention (g = .23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.44). Studies using a usual care control arm demonstrated a small effect in favor of MCIs (g = .26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.42). However, there was insufficient evidence of a superior effect for MCIs when compared to an active control group, including attention control. Few studies examined both short-term and long-term outcomes.

conclusionsThere is evidence for MCIs improving psychosocial outcomes in male cancer survivors. However, this effect is not demonstrated when limited to studies that used active controls. The effect size found in this meta-analysis is smaller than those reported in MCI studies of mixed gender and female cancer patient populations. More rigorously designed randomized trials are needed that include active control groups, which control for attention, and long-term follow-up. There may be unique challenges for addressing the psychosocial needs of male cancer patients that future interventions should consider.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsMeditationMindfulnessPosttraumatic Growth, PsychologicalTai JiAdultHumansMaleNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CareCancerMenMindfulness-based interventionsSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID31773148
PMCPMC7168578
OpenAlexW2989873973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.