Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31773143›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin and Vancomycin in Children and Adolescents with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial (SUNSHINE).

Joshua Wolf, Krisztina Kalocsai, Claudia Fortuny, Stefan Lazar, Samantha Bosis, Bartosz Korczowski, Arnaud Petit, Daniel Bradford, Rodney Croos-Dabrera, Elodie Incera and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02218372 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Investigator-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Oral Suspension or Tablets Taken q12h, and Vancomycin Oral Liquid or Capsules Taken q6h, for 10 Days in Pediatric Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02218372 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Investigator-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Oral Suspension or Tablets Taken q12h, and Vancomycin Oral Liquid or Capsules Taken q6h, for 10 Days in Pediatric Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma Europe B.V.Ran2015 to 2018Enrolled148ConditionsClostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)ArmsFidaxomicin oral suspension, Fidaxomicin tablets, Vancomycin oral liquid, Vancomycin capsules
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  7. Multiple episodes of paediatricBMJ case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Identification of risk factors forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  10. Infectious disease reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Comparative effectiveness of metronidazole and vancomycin for treatment ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  14. Guideline for the management ofEClinicalMedicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Journal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Clostridioides difficile Infections: Prevention and Treatment Strategies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Antimicrobial Resistance ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  20. The management ofMedicine and pharmacy reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Joshua WolfDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Krisztina KalocsaiGyermekinfektológia, Dél-pesti Centrumkórház Országos Haematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Claudia FortunyDepartment of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Stefan LazarDepartment of Pediatrics, Clinical Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases "Dr. Victor Babeș," Bucharest, Romania.
Samantha BosisPediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Bartosz KorczowskiDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Arnaud PetitDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hôpital Trousseau, HUEP, APHP, Paris, France.
Daniel BradfordAstellas Pharma B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rodney Croos-DabreraAstellas Pharma Development, Northbrook, Illinois, USA.
Elodie InceraAstellas Pharma B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Joost MelisAstellas Pharma B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob van MaanenAstellas Pharma B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLAstellas Pharma (United States) · USFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHôpital Armand-Trousseau · FRHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESRzeszów University · PLSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFidaxomicin, a narrow-spectrum antibiotic approved for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in adults, is associated with lower rates of recurrence than vancomycin; however, pediatric data are limited. This multicenter, investigator-blind, phase 3, parallel-group trial assessed the safety and efficacy of fidaxomicin in children.

methodsPatients aged <18 years with confirmed CDI were randomized 2:1 to 10 days of treatment with fidaxomicin (suspension or tablets, twice daily) or vancomycin (suspension or tablets, 4 times daily). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. The primary efficacy end point was confirmed clinical response (CCR), 2 days after the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points included global cure (GC; CCR without CDI recurrence) 30 days after EOT (end of study; EOS). Plasma and stool concentrations of fidaxomicin and its active metabolite OP-1118 were measured.

resultsOf 148 patients randomized, 142 were treated (30 <2 years old). The proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events was similar with fidaxomicin (73.5%) and vancomycin (75.0%). Of 3 deaths in the fidaxomicin arm during the study, none were CDI or treatment related. The rate of CCR at 2 days after EOT was 77.6% (76 of 98 patients) with fidaxomicin and 70.5% (31 of 44) with vancomycin, whereas the rate of GC at EOS was significantly higher in participants receiving fidaxomicin (68.4% vs 50.0%; adjusted treatment difference, 18.8%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5%-35.3%). Systemic absorption of fidaxomicin and OP-1118 was minimal, and stool concentrations were high.

conclusionsCompared with vancomycin, fidaxomicin was well tolerated and demonstrated significantly higher rates of GC in children and adolescents with CDI. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02218372.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClostridioidesClostridiumFidaxomicinHumansSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicinVancomycinClostridioides difficile infectionfidaxomicinpediatricvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID31773143
PMCPMC7744996
OpenAlexW2989827191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.