ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019
Optical imaging with a novel cathepsin-activatable probe for enhanced detection of colorectal cancer.
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and preclinical evaluation of selective vinyl sulfone-based probes for PET imaging of tumor-associated cathepsins.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026Article
- Clinical fluorescent contrast agents for image-guided surgery.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection.Cancers · 2023Article
- Cathepsin protease expression in infiltrative soft tissue sarcomas: cathepsin-K correlates with infiltrative tumor growth and clinical outcomes.Human pathology · 2023Article
- Hyperpolarized [1-Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Fundamentals and developments in fluorescence-guided cancer surgery.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Polyglutamate-based nanoconjugates for image-guided surgery and post-operative melanoma metastases prevention.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Molecular probes for selective detection of cysteine cathepsins.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2021Review
- Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in the Surgical Treatment of Gliomas: Past, Present and Future.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated a cysteine cathepsin-activatable optical imaging probe (LUM015) with improved kinetics relative to larger macromolecules for detection and characterization of colorectal cancer (CRC), and thereby assessed its potential use in fluorescence-guided colonoscopy. We showed that LUM015 is stable in plasma. In-vitro studies demonstrated selectivity of LUM015 for targeting cathepsins; there was robust increase in emitted fluorescence signal from the cathepsin overexpressing HT-29 CRC cells within 1-5 minutes after incubation with LUM015 compared to the cells incubated with combination of LUM015 and a pan-protease inhibitor (as negative control). Biodistribution, differential accumulation of the probe in the tumor and tumor-to-background fluorescence signal ratio of LUM015 were compared to ProSense680, a commercially available protease-activatable optical imaging probe, over 24 hours after intravenous injection of the probes in nude mice with subcutaneously implanted HT-29 tumors. LUM015 showed distinct kinetics compared to ProSense680 with time to peak signal for subcutaneous tumor-to-colon ratio of 3.3±0.3 (mean ± SD) at 4-8 hours compared to 2.9±0.2 at 24 hours, respectively (n=8 for each group). Near-infrared fluorescence imaging and dual channel colonoscopy of the mice with orthotopic colon tumors showed tumor-to-colon ratio of 3.7±0.2 in HT-29 tumors (n=4), 2.8±0.1 in genetically engineered mice with APC
Indexed as
Identifiers
31772821PMC6872479W2995053472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.