Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772821›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Optical imaging with a novel cathepsin-activatable probe for enhanced detection of colorectal cancer.

Shadi A Esfahani, Pedram Heidari, Melanie H Kucherlapati, Jorge M Ferrer, Raju S Kucherlapati, Umar Mahmood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hyperpolarized [1-Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shadi A EsfahaniAthinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown, MA, USA.
Pedram HeidariAthinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown, MA, USA.
Melanie H KucherlapatiDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Jorge M FerrerLumicell, Inc 275 Washington Street, Newton, MA, USA.
Raju S KucherlapatiDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Umar MahmoodAthinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · US

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
Tissue and Pathology ResourcesP50CA127003 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BASS, ADAM JOEL · 2007 to 2023
$33.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated a cysteine cathepsin-activatable optical imaging probe (LUM015) with improved kinetics relative to larger macromolecules for detection and characterization of colorectal cancer (CRC), and thereby assessed its potential use in fluorescence-guided colonoscopy. We showed that LUM015 is stable in plasma. In-vitro studies demonstrated selectivity of LUM015 for targeting cathepsins; there was robust increase in emitted fluorescence signal from the cathepsin overexpressing HT-29 CRC cells within 1-5 minutes after incubation with LUM015 compared to the cells incubated with combination of LUM015 and a pan-protease inhibitor (as negative control). Biodistribution, differential accumulation of the probe in the tumor and tumor-to-background fluorescence signal ratio of LUM015 were compared to ProSense680, a commercially available protease-activatable optical imaging probe, over 24 hours after intravenous injection of the probes in nude mice with subcutaneously implanted HT-29 tumors. LUM015 showed distinct kinetics compared to ProSense680 with time to peak signal for subcutaneous tumor-to-colon ratio of 3.3±0.3 (mean ± SD) at 4-8 hours compared to 2.9±0.2 at 24 hours, respectively (n=8 for each group). Near-infrared fluorescence imaging and dual channel colonoscopy of the mice with orthotopic colon tumors showed tumor-to-colon ratio of 3.7±0.2 in HT-29 tumors (n=4), 2.8±0.1 in genetically engineered mice with APC

Indexed as

activatable probeCathepsincolorectal canceroptical imagingtumor detection

Identifiers

PMID31772821
PMCPMC6872479
OpenAlexW2995053472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.