ArticleOxford medical case reports2019
Presentation of treatment effect in glioblastoma after dose-escalation radiation therapy.
Article in Oxford medical case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Limited treatment options and the intense nature of therapy make determining the appropriate treatment course for each patient difficult. The appearance of transient worsening of imaging findings, known as treatment effect, after chemoradiation further complicates clinical decision-making. Accurately differentiating treatment effects from true progression is critical as subsequent treatment decisions are based largely on radiographic evidence of tumor progression. As chemoradiation can cause worsening of imaging findings, it is possible that the use of new treatments and modified chemoradiation regimens may alter the presentation of treatment effect. Therefore, physicians should be aware that atypical presentations of treatment effects can occur, and may be more likely, when treatment regimens are modified. Here, we present the case of a patient with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wild type, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-methylated glioblastoma who underwent dose-escalation radiation therapy (to 75 Gy) and exhibited worsened imaging findings at 8 months post-radiation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.