ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2018
ADJUSTED REGULARIZATION IN LATENT GRAPHICAL MODELS: APPLICATION TO MULTIPLE-NEURON SPIKE COUNT DATA.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphical Model Inference with Erosely Measured Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Identification of interacting neural populations: methods and statistical considerations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Review
- Latent Network Estimation and Variable Selection for Compositional Data Via Variational EM.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2022Article
- ADJUSTED REGULARIZATION IN LATENT GRAPHICAL MODELS: APPLICATION TO MULTIPLE-NEURON SPIKE COUNT DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in contemporary neuroscience is to analyze data from large numbers of neurons recorded simultaneously across many experimental replications (trials), where the data are counts of neural firing events, and one of the basic problems is to characterize the dependence structure among such multivariate counts. Methods of estimating high-dimensional covariation based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.