Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772400›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with dexmedetomidine: A comparison between intravenous and intranasal route.

Saikat Niyogi, Asit Biswas, Indrani Chakraborty, Soumya Chakraborty, Amita Acharjee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Comparison of propofol aloneWorld journal of methodology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saikat NiyogiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Asit BiswasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Indrani ChakrabortyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Soumya ChakrabortyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Amita AcharjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Bangur Institute of Neurosciences · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHaemodynamic changes during endotracheal intubation are major concerns in general anaesthesia This study compared the efficacy of intranasal and intravenous dexmedetomidine (DEX) to attenuate the stress response of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

methodsIn this prospective, randomised, double-blinded study, 70 adults were divided into two groups [Group D

resultsIn both the groups, all the haemodynamic parameters were maintained within (20% of baseline values) throughout the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in MAP between two groups (

conclusionLike IV DEX, intranasal DEX can also attenuate the haemodynamic stress responses of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation without significant differences in MAP between two groups.

Indexed as

Intranasal dexmedetomidineintravenous dexmedetomidinelaryngoscopy and intubation

Identifiers

PMID31772400
PMCPMC6868674
OpenAlexW2988434666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.