Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772393›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2019

The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour.

Kelly R Finn, Matthew J Silk, Mason A Porter, Noa Pinter-Wollman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Societies with fission-fusion dynamics as complex adaptive systems: the importance of scale.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Quantum cyber-physical systems.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly R FinnAnimal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, U.S.A.
Matthew J SilkEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, U.K.
Mason A PorterDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, U.S.A.
Noa Pinter-WollmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, U.S.A.

Funding

Modeling how keystone individuals emerge and influence disease transmissionR01GM115509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PINTER-WOLLMAN, NOA MICHAL · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network analysis has driven key developments in research on animal behaviour by providing quantitative methods to study the social structures of animal groups and populations. A recent formalism, known as

Indexed as

behavioural dynamicscentralitycollective behaviourfission–fusiongroup-livinglevels of organizationmultilayer network analysisquantitative methodssocial behaviorsocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID31772393
PMCPMC6879184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.