Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772262›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Gene gain and loss push prokaryotes beyond the homologous recombination barrier and accelerate genome sequence divergence.

Jaime Iranzo, Yuri I Wolf, Eugene V Koonin, Itamar Sela

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Linkage of nucleotide and functional diversity varies across gut bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolic capabilities are highly conserved among human nasal-associatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Comparative genomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jaime IranzoNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-7726
Yuri I WolfNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0247-8708
Eugene V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-8299
Itamar SelaNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. itamar.sela@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-6392
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial and archaeal evolution involve extensive gene gain and loss. Thus, phylogenetic trees of prokaryotes can be constructed both by traditional sequence-based methods (gene trees) and by comparison of gene compositions (genome trees). Comparing the branch lengths in gene and genome trees with identical topologies for 34 clusters of closely related bacterial and archaeal genomes, we show here that terminal branches of gene trees are systematically compressed compared to those of genome trees. Thus, sequence evolution is delayed compared to genome evolution by gene gain and loss. The extent of this delay differs widely among bacteria and archaea. Mathematical modeling shows that the divergence delay can result from sequence homogenization by homologous recombination. The model explains how homologous recombination maintains the cohesiveness of the core genome of a species while allowing extensive gene gain and loss within the accessory genome. Once evolving genomes become isolated by barriers impeding homologous recombination, gene and genome evolution processes settle into parallel trajectories, and genomes diverge, resulting in speciation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialHomologous RecombinationModels, GeneticGenes, ArchaealGenes, BacterialGenomicsPhylogenyProkaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID31772262
PMCPMC6879757
OpenAlexW2991507217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.