Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772236›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Combination effect of lapatinib with foretinib in HER2 and MET co-activated experimental esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Md Sazzad Hassan, Fiona Williams, Niranjan Awasthi, Margaret A Schwarz, Roderich E Schwarz, Jun Li, Urs von Holzen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The MET Oncogene Network of Interacting Cell Surface Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Sazzad HassanDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA. hassansa@iu.edu.
Fiona WilliamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Niranjan AwasthiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA.
Margaret A SchwarzHarper Cancer Research Institute, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA.
Roderich E SchwarzDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA.
Jun LiDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Urs von HolzenDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, 46617, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineMike and Josie Harper Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of Notre Dame · USIndiana University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that HER2 and MET receptor tyrosine kinases are co-overexpressed in a subset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We therefore studied the usefulness of combining HER2 and MET targeting by small-molecule inhibitors lapatinib and foretinib, respectively, both in in-vitro and in-vivo models of experimental EAC. We characterized MET and HER2 activation in a panel of human EAC cell lines, and the differential susceptibility of these EAC cell lines to single agent or combination of foretinib and lapatinib. We then explored the antitumor efficacy with survival advantage following foretinib and lapatinib monotherapy and in combination in murine subcutaneous xenograft and peritoneal metastatic survival models of human EAC. The OE33 EAC cell line with strong expression of phosphorylated both MET and HER2, demonstrated reduced sensitivity to foretinib and lapatinib when used as a single agent. The co-administration of foretinib and lapatinib effectively inhibited both MET and HER2 phosphorylation, enhanced inhibition of cell proliferation and xenograft tumor growth by inducing apoptosis, and significantly enhanced mouse overall survival, overcoming single agent resistance. In the OE19 EAC cell line with mainly HER2 phosphorylation, and the ESO51 EAC cell line with mainly MET phosphorylation, profound cell growth inhibition with induction of apoptosis was observed in response to single agent with lack of enhanced growth inhibition when the two agents were combined. These data suggest that combination therapy with foretinib and lapatinib should be tested as a treatment option for HER2 positive patients with MET-overexpressing EAC, and could be a novel treatment strategy for specific EAC patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnilidesAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCarboplatinCell Line, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLapatinibMiceMice, Inbred NODAnilidesAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCarboplatinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGSK 1363089LapatinibMET protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsPaclitaxelProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID31772236
PMCPMC6879590
OpenAlexW2991442802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.