Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772103›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Medication errors during simulated paediatric resuscitations: a prospective, observational human reliability analysis.

Nicholas Appelbaum, Jonathan Clarke, Calandra Feather, Bryony Franklin, Ruchi Sinha, Phillip Pratt, Ian Maconochie, Ara Darzi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas AppelbaumDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, London, UK n.appelbaum@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-6828
Jonathan ClarkeNIHR-Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1495-7746
Calandra FeatherDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1322-6589
Bryony FranklinNIHR-Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, London, UK.
Ruchi SinhaDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, Division of Women and Children's Services, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Phillip PrattHelix Centre for Design in Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ian MaconochieDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, London, UK.
Ara DarziDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedication errors during paediatric resuscitation are thought to be common. However, there is little evidence about the individual process steps that contribute to such medication errors in this context.

objectivesTo describe the incidence, nature and severity of medication errors in simulated paediatric resuscitations, and to employ human reliability analysis to understand the contribution of discrepancies in individual process steps to the occurrence of these errors.

methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study of simulated resuscitations subjected to video microanalysis, identification of medication errors, severity assessment and human reliability analysis in a large English teaching hospital. Fifteen resuscitation teams of two doctors and two nurses each conducted one of two simulated paediatric resuscitation scenarios.

resultsAt least one medication error was observed in every simulated case, and a large magnitude (>25% discrepant) or clinically significant error in 11 of 15 cases. Medication errors were observed in 29% of 180 simulated medication administrations, 40% of which considered to be moderate or severe. These errors were the result of 884 observed discrepancies at a number of steps in the drug ordering, preparation and administration stages of medication use, 8% of which made a major contribution to a resultant medication error. Most errors were introduced by discrepancies during drug preparation and administration.

conclusionsMedication errors were common with a considerable proportion likely to result in patient harm. There is an urgent need to optimise existing systems and to commission research into new approaches to increase the reliability of human interactions during administration of medication in the paediatric emergency setting.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, TeachingHumansInfantManikinsMedical Staff, HospitalMedication ErrorsPediatricsProspective StudiesResuscitationpaediatric A&E and ambulatory carepaediatric anaesthesiapaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID31772103
PMCPMC6886970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.