Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31772100›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Finnish Trial on Practices of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (FACADE): a protocol for a prospective randomised non-inferiority trial comparing outpatient versus inpatient care.

Kimmo Lönnrot, Simo Taimela, Pirjo Toivonen, Pasi Aronen, Anniina Koski-Palken, Janek Frantzen, Ville Leinonen, Marja Silvasti-Lundell, Johannes Förster, Teppo Jarvinen and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03979443 (Finnish Trial on Practices of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03979443 nacompletednot on this map

Finnish Trial on Practices of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (FACADE): A Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Outpatient vs. Inpatient Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled104ConditionsCervical RadiculopathyArmsDischarge on the day of surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kimmo LönnrotDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland kimmo.lonnrot@hus.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-1007
Simo TaimelaFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-2983
Pirjo ToivonenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pasi AronenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anniina Koski-PalkenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Janek FrantzenDivision of Clinical neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ville LeinonenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kys, Finland.
Marja Silvasti-LundellDivision of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johannes FörsterDepartment of Anaesthesia, Orthopaedic Hospital Orton, Helsinki, Finland.
Teppo JarvinenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3713-956X
FACADE investigators
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIInvalidisäätiö · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough a great majority of patients with cervical radiculopathy syndrome can successfully be treated non-operatively, a considerable proportion experience persistent symptoms, severe enough to require neurosurgical intervention. During the past decade, cervical spine procedures have increasingly been performed on an outpatient basis and retrospective database analyses have shown this to be feasible and safe. However, there are no randomised controlled studies comparing outpatient care with inpatient care, particularly with emphasis on the patients' perception of symptom relief and their ability to return to normal daily activities and work. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group non-inferiority trial comparing the traditional hospital surveillance (inpatient, patients staying in the hospital for 1-3 nights after surgery) with outpatient care (discharge on the day of the surgery, usually within 6-8 hours after procedure) in patients who have undergone anterior cervical decompression and fusion procedure. To determine whether early discharge (outpatient care) is non-inferior to inpatient care, we will randomise 104 patients to these two groups and follow them for 6 months using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as the primary outcome. We expect that early discharge is not significantly worse than the current care in terms of change in NDI. Non-inferiority will be declared if the mean improvement for outpatient care is no worse than the mean improvement for inpatient care, by a margin of 17.3%. We hypothesise that a shorter hospital stay results in more rapid return to normal daily activities, shorter duration of sick leave and decreased secondary costs to healthcare system. Secondary outcomes in our study are arm pain and neck pain using the Numeric Rating Scale, operative success (Odom's criteria), patient's satisfaction to treatment, general quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Work Ability Score, sickness absence days, return to previous leisure activities and complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District on 6 June 2019 (1540/2019) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03979443.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareDecompression, SurgicalHospitalizationSpinal FusionCervical VertebraeEquivalence Trials as TopicFinlandHumansLeisure ActivitiesPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRadiculopathyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReturn to WorkSick Leaveanterior cervical decompression and fusioncervical spine surgeryoutpatient careprotocolrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31772100
PMCPMC6886918
OpenAlexW2990241975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.