ArticleBMJ open2019
Regional multidisciplinary team intervention programme to improve colorectal cancer outcomes: study protocol for the Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Improvement Programme (YCR BCIP).
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives in UK surgical settings and barriers and facilitators influencing their implementation: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.BMJ open quality · 2023Pooled it
- From tradition to transformation: evolving models of care in clinical genetics.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Experience-based co-design of an active case finding service for colorectal cancer in community pharmacies: findings from a focused ethnography.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Approvers, Disapprovers, and Strugglers: a Q-methodology study of rectal cancer MRI proforma use.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Variation in perioperative practice in elective colorectal cancer surgery: opportunities for quality improvement.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The ATOM-Seq sequence capture panel can accurately predict microsatellite instability status in formalin-fixed tumour samples, alongside routine gene mutation testing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Encrypted federated learning for secure decentralized collaboration in cancer image analysis.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Transformer-based biomarker prediction from colorectal cancer histology: A large-scale multicentric study.Cancer cell · 2023Article
- A review and comparative study of cancer detection using machine learning: SBERT and SimCSE application.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Differences in the management of patients requiring an emergency resection for colonic cancer in two European populations.BJS open · 2022Article
- Swarm learning for decentralized artificial intelligence in cancer histopathology.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Data Resource Profile: The COloRECTal cancer data repository (CORECT-R).International journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Clinical-Grade Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Tumors by Deep Learning.Gastroenterology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough colorectal cancer outcomes in England are improving, they remain poorer than many comparable countries. Yorkshire Cancer Research has, therefore, established a Bowel Cancer Improvement Programme (YCR BCIP) to improve colorectal cancer outcomes within Yorkshire and Humber, a region representative of the nation. It aims to do this by quantifying variation in practice, engaging with the colorectal multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) to understand this and developing educational interventions to minimise it and improve outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Initially, routine health datasets will be used to quantify variation in the demographics, management and outcomes of patients across the Yorkshire and Humber region and results presented to MDTs. The YCR BCIP is seeking to supplement these existing data with patient-reported health-related quality of life information (patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs) and tissue sample analysis. Specialty groups (surgery, radiology, pathology, clinical oncology, medical oncology, clinical nurse specialists and anaesthetics) have been established to provide oversight and direction for their clinical area within the programme, to review data and analysis and to develop appropriate educational initiatives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The YCR BCIP is aiming to address the variation in practice to significantly improve colorectal cancer outcomes across the Yorkshire and Humber region. PROMs and tissue sample collection and analysis will help to capture the information required to fully assess care in the region. Engagement of the region's MDTs with their data will lead to a range of educational initiatives, studies and clinical audits that aim to optimise practice across the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.