ArticleGenetics2020
Breeding Top Genotypes and Accelerating Response to Recurrent Selection by Selecting Parents with Greater Gametic Variance.
Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative study on recombination activity in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Strategies to improve on selection based on estimated breeding values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- PyMSQ: a Python package for fast Mendelian sampling (co)variance and haplotype-based similarity in genomic selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Optimization of family sizes in sets of crosses with a greedy allocation strategy based on automatic differentiation.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A Similarity Matrix for Preserving Haplotype Diversity Amongst Parents in Genomic Selection.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Combining ability of banana triploid hybrid progenitors and genomic prediction of cross performance for agro-morphological traits.Genetics · 2025Article
- Optimization of recurrent rapid cycle breeding in maize for sustained long-term genetic improvement via stochastic simulations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Relative effectiveness in genetic gain from genomic selection of candidate dams versus genomic selection of their progeny.JDS communications · 2025Article
- Is there an advantage of using genomic information to estimate gametic variances and improve recurrent selection in animal populations?Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Prediction of additive genetic variances of descendants for complex families based on Mendelian sampling variances.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Cross potential selection: a proposal for optimizing crossing combinations in recurrent selection using the usefulness criterion of future inbred lines.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Validation of cross-progeny variance genomic prediction using simulations and experimental data in winter elite bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Improving selection decisions with mating information by accounting for Mendelian sampling variances looking two generations ahead.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Comparison of genomic-enabled cross selection criteria for the improvement of inbred line breeding populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: II. Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection with full-sib and half-sib families.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Digital Phenotyping: A Game Changer for the Broiler Industry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Heterosis patterns and sources of self-compatibility, cross-compatibility and key nut traits within single and double hybrid crosses of kola [Cola nitida (Vent) Schott and Endl.].Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Reintroducing genetic diversity in populations from cryopreserved material: the case of Abondance, a French local dairy cattle breed.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of variation in linkage phase and heterozygosity among individuals, some individuals produce genetically more variable gametes than others. With the availability of genomic EBVs (GEBVs) or estimates of SNP-effects together with phased genotypes, differences in gametic variability can be quantified by simulating a set of virtual gametes of each selection candidate. Previous results in dairy cattle show that gametic variance can be large. Here, we show that breeders can increase the probability of breeding a top-ranking genotype and response to recurrent selection by selecting parents that produce more variable gametes, using the index [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is the standardized normal truncation point belonging to selected proportion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.