Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771647›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2019

Building an Otoscopic screening prototype tool using deep learning.

Devon Livingstone, Aron S Talai, Justin Chau, Nils D Forkert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A randomised trial to assess the educational benefit of a smartphone otoscope in undergraduate medical training.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research and application progress in deep learning in otology.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ENT from afar: Opportunities for remote patient assessment, clinical management, teaching and learning.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Devon LivingstoneDivision of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 7th floor, 4448 Front Street SE, Calgary, Alberta, T3M 1M4, Canada. dmliving@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4734-0980
Aron S TalaiDepartment of Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Justin ChauDivision of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 7th floor, 4448 Front Street SE, Calgary, Alberta, T3M 1M4, Canada.
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOtologic diseases are often difficult to diagnose accurately for primary care providers. Deep learning methods have been applied with great success in many areas of medicine, often outperforming well trained human observers. The aim of this work was to develop and evaluate an automatic software prototype to identify otologic abnormalities using a deep convolutional neural network. MATERIAL AND

methodsA database of 734 unique otoscopic images of various ear pathologies, including 63 cerumen impactions, 120 tympanostomy tubes, and 346 normal tympanic membranes were acquired. 80% of the images were used for the training of a convolutional neural network and the remaining 20% were used for algorithm validation. Image augmentation was employed on the training dataset to increase the number of training images. The general network architecture consisted of three convolutional layers plus batch normalization and dropout layers to avoid over fitting.

resultsThe validation based on 45 datasets not used for model training revealed that the proposed deep convolutional neural network is capable of identifying and differentiating between normal tympanic membranes, tympanostomy tubes, and cerumen impactions with an overall accuracy of 84.4%.

conclusionOur study shows that deep convolutional neural networks hold immense potential as a diagnostic adjunct for otologic disease management.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerDatabases, FactualEar DiseasesHumansMass ScreeningOtoscopyReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceAutomatedDeep learningMachine learningNeural networkOtoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31771647
PMCPMC6880418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.