Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771601›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

A Phase I/II trial comparing autologous dendritic cell vaccine pulsed either with personalized peptides (PEP-DC) or with tumor lysate (OC-DC) in patients with advanced high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma.

Apostolos Sarivalasis, Caroline Boudousquié, Klara Balint, Brian J Stevenson, Philippe O Gannon, Emanuela Marina Iancu, Laetitia Rossier, Silvia Martin Lluesma, Patrice Mathevet, Christine Sempoux and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advanced T and Natural Killer Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sources of Cancer Neoantigens beyond Single-Nucleotide Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Apostolos SarivalasisDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline BoudousquiéDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Klara BalintDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Brian J StevensonSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe O GannonDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emanuela Marina IancuDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laetitia RossierDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvia Martin LluesmaDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrice MathevetWomen-Mother-Child Department, Service of Gynecology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christine SempouxDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
George CoukosDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Urania DafniLaboratory of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alexandre HarariDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michal Bassani-SternbergDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lana E KandalaftDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Lana.Kandalaft@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-1575-6674
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at a late stage with 85% of them relapsing after surgery and standard chemotherapy; for this reason, new treatments are urgently needed. Ovarian cancer has become a candidate for immunotherapy by reason of their expression of shared tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and private mutated neoantigens (NeoAgs) and the recognition of the tumor by the immune system. Additionally, the presence of intraepithelial tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of active immunotherapy, including vaccination, is to generate a new anti-tumor response and amplify an existing immune response. Recently developed NeoAgs-based cancer vaccines have the advantage of being more tumor specific, reducing the potential for immunological tolerance, and inducing robust immunogenicity.

methodsWe propose a randomized phase I/II study in patients with advanced ovarian cancer to compare the immunogenicity and to assess safety and feasibility of two personalized DC vaccines. After standard of care surgery and chemotherapy, patients will receive either a novel vaccine consisting of autologous DCs pulsed with up to ten peptides (PEP-DC), selected using an agnostic, yet personalized, epitope discovery algorithm, or a sequential combination of a DC vaccine loaded with autologous oxidized tumor lysate (OC-DC) prior to an equivalent PEP-DC vaccine. All vaccines will be administered in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide. This study is the first attempt to compare the two approaches and to use NeoAgs-based vaccines in ovarian cancer in the adjuvant setting. DISCUSSION: The proposed treatment takes advantage of the beneficial effects of pre-treatment with OC-DC prior to PEP-DC vaccination, prompting immune response induction against a wide range of patient-specific antigens, and amplification of pre-existing NeoAgs-specific T cell clones. Trial registration This trial is already approved by Swissmedic (Ref.: 2019TpP1004) and will be registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov before enrollment opens.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDendritic CellsFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPeptidesTransplantation, AutologousCancer VaccinesPeptidesCancer immunotherapyCyclophosphamideDendritic cell vaccineNeoantigenNeoepitopeOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID31771601
PMCPMC6880492
OpenAlexW2991570475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.