Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771573›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Delivery of a patient-friendly functioning report to improve patient-centeredness of dialysis care: a pilot study.

Laura C Plantinga, Brian Jones, Jeremy Johnson, Amelia Lambeth, Janice P Lea, Leigh Nadel, Ann E Vandenberg, C Barrett Bowling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C PlantingaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. laura.plantinga@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0809-8981
Brian JonesInteractive Media Technology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jeremy JohnsonInteractive Media Technology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Amelia LambethInteractive Media Technology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Janice P LeaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Leigh NadelDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ann E VandenbergDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
C Barrett BowlingDurham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USDuke University · US

Funding

Sustained blood pressure control and progression of multimorbidityR01HL133618 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOWLING, CHRISTOPHER BARRETT · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
HSRD VA CIN 13-410NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133618NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL133618Satellite Healthcare Extramural Grant Program (EGP)U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) (CIN 13-410)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvider recognition of level of functioning may be suboptimal in the dialysis setting, and this lack of recognition may lead to less patient-centered care. We aimed to assess whether delivery of an app-based, individualized functioning report would improve patients' perceptions of patient-centeredness of care.

methodsIn this pre-post pilot study at three outpatient dialysis facilities in metropolitan Atlanta, an individualized functioning report-including information on physical performance, perceived physical functioning, and community mobility-was delivered to patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 43) and their providers. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to gather patient and provider feedback to develop and assess the report and app. Paired t test was used to test for differences in patient perception of patient-centeredness of care (PPPC) scores (range, 1 = most patient-centered to 4 = least patient-centered) 1 month after report delivery.

resultsDelivery of the reports to both patients and providers was not associated with a subsequent change in patients' perceptions of patient-centeredness of their care (follow-up vs. baseline PPPC scores of 2.35 vs. 2.36; P > 0.9). However, patients and providers generally saw the potential of the report to improve the patient-centeredness of care and reacted positively to the individualized reports delivered in the pilot. Patients also reported willingness to undergo future assessments. However, while two-thirds of surveyed providers reported always or sometimes discussing the reports they received, most (98%) participating patients reported that no one on the dialysis care team had discussed the report with them within 1 month.

conclusionsPotential lack of fidelity to the intervention precludes definitive conclusions about effects of the report on patient-centeredness of care. The disconnect between patients' and providers' perceptions of discussions of the report warrants future study. However, this study introduces a novel, individualized, multi-domain functional report that is easily implemented in the setting of hemodialysis. Our pilot study provides guidance for improving its use both clinically and in future pragmatic research studies, both within and beyond the dialysis population.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementRenal DialysisSurveys and QuestionnairesHemodialysisPatient-centered carePatient-provider communicationPhysical functioning

Identifiers

PMID31771573
PMCPMC6880368
OpenAlexW2990527350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.