Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771543›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Vaccine confidence in China after the Changsheng vaccine incident: a cross-sectional study.

Baohua Liu, Ruohui Chen, Miaomiao Zhao, Xin Zhang, Jiahui Wang, Lijun Gao, Jiao Xu, Qunhong Wu, Ning Ning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Baohua LiuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ruohui ChenDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Miaomiao ZhaoDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jiahui WangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Lijun GaoDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jiao XuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. wuqunhong@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-5266
Ning NingDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Managment, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. ningninghyd@163.com.
Harbin Medical University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China Grant No.201002028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina's achievements in immunization are being threatened by a vaccine crisis. This paper aims to investigate vaccine confidence in China after the Changsheng vaccine incident and attempts to identify the factors contributing to it.

methodsAn online cross-sectional investigation was conducted from 1 to 25 September 2018. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were performed to examine the associations between socio-demographic factors, cognition and attitudes towards the Changsheng vaccine incident and vaccine confidence.

resultsWe included 1115 respondents in the final analysis, and found that approximately 70% (783) of the respondents did not have vaccine confidence. More than half of the respondents (54.53%) were dissatisfied with the government's response measures to the Changsheng vaccine incident. The logistic regression model indicated that vaccine confidence was positively associated with the degree of satisfaction with the government's response measures (OR = 1.621, 95% CI = 1.215-2.163), attitudes towards the risks and benefits of vaccination (OR = 1.501, 95% CI = 1.119-2.013), concerns about vaccine safety (OR = 0.480, 95% CI = 0.317-0.726), and vaccine efficacy (OR = 0.594, 95% CI = 0.394-0.895).

conclusionsA majority of the respondents held negative attitudes towards vaccines after the Changsheng vaccine incident. A coordinated effort is required to restore public confidence in vaccines, especially in China, where a nationwide mandatory immunization policy is implemented. To end dissent towards inoculation, a series of actions is crucial and multiple parties should work together to advance efforts and explore the possibility of establishing an open and transparent regulatory system.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationVaccinesYoung AdultVaccinesConfidenceNegative vaccine incidentVaccineVaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID31771543
PMCPMC6880575
OpenAlexW2991118160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.