Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771537›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Co-producing childbirth knowledge: a qualitative study of birth stories in antenatal sessions.

Leah de Quattro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leah de QuattroCentre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Manchester, Simon Building 2.54, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. leah.dequattro@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-3403

Funding

CONSTRUCTION OF CANCER LABORATORY RESEARCH BUILDINGC06CA058690 · NCI · CANCER THERAPY AND RESEARCH CENTER · PI FIELDS, KAREN · 1994 to 1995
–
Economic and Social Research Council NWSSDTP Ref: 5869018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBirth stories surround pregnant women. Existing research on childbirth knowledge suggests that personal accounts from family and friends play a foundational role upon which other information builds. However, among the handful of studies that specifically address the educational role of birth stories, stories appeared to have little impact on knowledge creation. This paper engages with this discussion by exploring how birth stories contributed to the co-construction of birth knowledge within the specific context of antenatal sessions. Findings draw from the pilot study of a project which seeks to understand how women use collective approaches to co-produce birth knowledge.

methodResearch data drew from participant observation of group-led Homebirth sessions (25 participants) and teacher-led National Childbirth Trust classes (18 participants). The researcher analysed transcripts using template analysis, a form of thematic content analysis, with principles from feminist ethnography and narrative analysis.

resultsStorytelling proved central to mother-to-mother antenatal group practices, providing not only information, but also a means for understanding. This educational work took place through various mechanisms: Stories (re)shaped expectations, shared practical techniques, navigated different truth claims and approaches to knowledge, and helped build supportive communities of parents. These findings emerged more prominently in group-led sessions compared to teacher-led sessions.

conclusionCompared to teacher-led norms, storytelling and other collective approaches to antenatal education provide additional resources to childbearing women. As dialogic, complex and flexible learning tools, stories offer uniquely diverse, credible and supportive messages. The next phase of this project will further investigate these findings, explore informal collective practices, and seek to evaluate the impact of collective knowledge on childbirth experiences.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePersonal Narratives as TopicAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFriendsHumansParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal EducationQualitative ResearchAntenatalBirth storiesChildbirthEducationGroup-ledKnowledgeParticipant-ledStorytelling

Identifiers

PMID31771537
PMCPMC6878671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.