Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771420›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019

Competition between delamination and tearing in multiple peeling problems.

Lucas Brely, Federico Bosia, Stefania Palumbo, Massimiliano Fraldi, Ali Dhinojwala, Nicola M Pugno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas BrelyDepartment of Physics and 'Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces' Inter-Departmental Centre, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Federico BosiaDepartment of Physics and 'Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces' Inter-Departmental Centre, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Stefania PalumboDepartment of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano FraldiDepartment of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ali DhinojwalaDepartment of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-3909, USA.
Nicola M PugnoLaboratory of Bio-Inspired and Graphene Nanomechanics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Università di Trento, via Mesiano, 77, I-38123 Trento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesive attachment systems consisting of multiple tapes or strands are commonly found in nature, for example in spider web anchorages or in mussel byssal threads, and their structure has been found to be ingeniously architected in order to optimize mechanical properties: in particular, to maximize dissipated energy before full detachment. These properties emerge from the complex interplay between mechanical and geometric parameters, including tape stiffness, adhesive energy, attached and detached lengths and peeling angles, which determine the occurrence of three main mechanisms: elastic deformation, interface delamination and tape fracture. In this paper, we introduce a formalism to evaluate the mechanical performance of multiple tape attachments in different parameter ranges, where an optimal (not maximal) adhesion energy emerges. We also introduce a numerical model to simulate the multiple peeling behaviour of complex structures, illustrating its predictions in the case of the staple-pin architecture. Finally, we present a proof-of-principle experiment to illustrate the predicted behaviour. We expect the presented formalism and the numerical model to provide important tools for the design of bioinspired adhesive systems with tuneable or optimized detachment properties.

Indexed as

Models, Theoreticaladhesionfracturemultiple peelingsimulationsspider web

Identifiers

PMID31771420
PMCPMC6893497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.